Zulip Chat Archive

Stream: maths

Topic: Kumar Eswaran's proof of RH


Martin Fabricius (Jul 01 2021 at 09:30):

Kumar Eswaran claimed to have proof for RH (back in 2016) and an Indian expert commitee concluded after a year long open review process since February 2020 that the proof is correct. I just want to draw attention to this so maybe the Lean community is interested in starting to verify his works:
https://www.researchgate.net/project/Lectures-on-Kumar-Eswarans-proposed-proof-of-the-Riemann-Hypothesis

Patrick Massot (Jul 01 2021 at 09:45):

If I understand correctly, there is nothing to check here. The error is well-known and has been known for years.

Kevin Buzzard (Jul 01 2021 at 09:46):

It's not the job of the Lean community to attempt to verify this proof, it's the job of the people who believe the proof to be correct.

Martin Fabricius (Jul 01 2021 at 09:46):

Yes, I read now something more about this and indeed it seems strange why the expert committee came to this conclusion.

Eric Wieser (Jul 01 2021 at 10:54):

I ended up reading about this this morning at https://skeptics.stackexchange.com/q/51965, which argues that the expert committee's review suffers from "an apparent lack of understanding of mathematical reasoning" which "[reduces] any credibility the committee might have had otherwise to zero".


Last updated: Dec 20 2023 at 11:08 UTC