Zulip Chat Archive
Stream: general
Topic: A module with a finite basis is finite
Riccardo Brasca (Dec 13 2021 at 13:19):
In linear_algebra.free_module.finite.basic
(how can I link a file and not a declaration?!) we have docs#module.finite.of_basis
lemma _root_.module.finite.of_basis {R : Type*} {M : Type*} {ι : Type*} [comm_ring R]
[add_comm_group M] [module R M] [fintype ι] (b : basis ι R M) : module.finite R M :=
I wrote this, but I don't remember why I made it a lemma and not an instance. The easiest reason is that if it is an instance we get an error in docs#module.End.supr_generalized_eigenspace_eq_top
eigenspace.lean:526:4
maximum class-instance resolution depth has been reached
I don't see the problem, I tried with set_option trace.class_instances true
, but the output is too long. Does someone see what is going wrong?
Johan Commelin (Dec 13 2021 at 13:20):
module.finite R M
doesn't mention the basis b
.
Johan Commelin (Dec 13 2021 at 13:20):
So the TC system has no way to find it.
Johan Commelin (Dec 13 2021 at 13:22):
If there was also some form of forward search, which sees basis ι R M
in your context, and finds [fintype ι]
and consequently invokes this instance, then that would be great. But that's not how TC inference works in Lean 3. It only works backwards from the goal.
Riccardo Brasca (Dec 13 2021 at 13:24):
Ah, I see, I thought it was somehow creating a loop.
Riccardo Brasca (Dec 13 2021 at 13:41):
In #10757 I've added the instance at least for fin n → R
, that seems very reasonable. (Indeed it golfs at least one proof.)
Johan Commelin (Dec 13 2021 at 13:42):
Yeah, you can certainly add instances for special cases.
Johan Commelin (Dec 13 2021 at 13:43):
You can even generalize fin n
to ι
+ [fintype ι]
.
Yury G. Kudryashov (Dec 13 2021 at 13:51):
Do we have an instance for Π i, M i
with [fintype ι]
[∀ i, module.finite R (M i)]
?
Yury G. Kudryashov (Dec 13 2021 at 13:52):
We already have https://leanprover-community.github.io/mathlib_docs/linear_algebra/finite_dimensional.html#finite_dimensional.finite_dimensional_pi
Riccardo Brasca (Dec 13 2021 at 14:00):
finite_dimensional
is now defined to be module.finite
, so in #10757 I generalize docs#finite_dimensional.finite_dimensional_pi (that is for division_ring
to any comm_ring
. It is a Prop
, so I don't think it is a problem to have both of them.
Sooner or later I will refactor linear_algebra.finite_dimensional
to move all the generalizable results to linear_algebra.free_module.finite.*
but it is quite a bit of work because of some problems with the import structure.
Riccardo Brasca (Dec 13 2021 at 14:00):
I wanted to do it one or two months ago but then I got absorbed by flt-regular
...
Riccardo Brasca (Dec 13 2021 at 14:02):
OMG I forgot to update the docstring of docs#finite_dimensional, that still says "finite_dimensional vector spaces are defined to be noetherian modules"?! :scream:
Riccardo Brasca (Dec 13 2021 at 14:02):
Let me fix it.
Riccardo Brasca (Dec 13 2021 at 14:09):
#10758 (this PR is just a couple of lines)
Floris van Doorn (Dec 14 2021 at 16:36):
Riccardo Brasca said:
linear_algebra.free_module.finite.basic
(how can I link a file and not a declaration?!)
file#linear_algebra/free_module/finite/basic
Riccardo Brasca (Dec 14 2021 at 16:53):
Thanks!
Last updated: Dec 20 2023 at 11:08 UTC