Zulip Chat Archive
Stream: general
Topic: Ab is abelian
Scott Morrison (Jul 10 2020 at 05:26):
@Markus Himmel, do you have already, or planned, the constructions that Ab
or Module R
are abelian?
Markus Himmel (Jul 10 2020 at 05:46):
I have the version for Module R
in my repository (but some cleanup is required)
Markus Himmel (Jul 10 2020 at 05:48):
Adding the version for Ab was the next thing on my todo list, but I only got as far as noticing that there is some stuff missing in subgroup.lean
(like cod_restrict
) until I got distracted by real-life obligations yet again
Kenny Lau (Jul 10 2020 at 05:48):
Ab is just Z-Mod!
Markus Himmel (Jul 10 2020 at 05:50):
Yes, but pulling the abelian
instance via this equivalence gives definitionally not-so-nice kernels, which would make working with exactness less fun
Johan Commelin (Jul 10 2020 at 05:50):
@Kenny Lau Sure, if you can turn that into a 1-line proof that Ab is abelian (and the resulting biproducts are actually usable), then I'll be you 3 good Belgian beers.
Scott Morrison (Jul 11 2020 at 09:04):
I just made #3366, which just provides has_image_maps Ab
. Later this will hopefully be obsoleted by [abelian Ab]
, but it would be good to check that that has equally good definitional behaviour.
Last updated: Dec 20 2023 at 11:08 UTC