Zulip Chat Archive
Stream: general
Topic: Accessing Nat type within inductive Typ
Cameron Crossman (Dec 13 2018 at 18:43):
I have the following inductive definition
inductive Typ
| Nat
| Fun : Typ → Typ → Typ
and I am trying to write a theorem and start by assuming some variable p is of type Typ.Nat, how do I go about doing so? I get
type expected at
Typ.Nat
term has type
Typ
error from assume p : Typ.Nat or something similar. Thanks!
Chris Hughes (Dec 13 2018 at 18:58):
Something like this might be what you want
inductive Typ | Nat : nat → Typ | Fun : Typ → Typ → Typ
Chris Hughes (Dec 13 2018 at 18:58):
Hang on.
Chris Hughes (Dec 13 2018 at 18:58):
Typ.Nat is not a Type, it's a constructor.
Cameron Crossman (Dec 13 2018 at 19:00):
Oh okay :+1:
Cameron Crossman (Dec 13 2018 at 19:00):
So I just construct of that type with variable p : Typ.Nat or something along those lines
Chris Hughes (Dec 13 2018 at 19:01):
Typ.nat : Typ
Reid Barton (Dec 13 2018 at 19:01):
Typ
has nothing to do with actual types, despite the name
Chris Hughes (Dec 13 2018 at 19:01):
(deleted)
Reid Barton (Dec 13 2018 at 19:01):
Maybe you want to define an interpretation Typ -> Type
Cameron Crossman (Dec 13 2018 at 19:04):
thanks!
Last updated: Dec 20 2023 at 11:08 UTC