Zulip Chat Archive
Stream: general
Topic: Discussion: ICARM
Matthew Ballard (Aug 04 2025 at 15:16):
For questions and discussions about ICARM
Kevin Buzzard (Aug 04 2025 at 15:16):
Congratulations!
(see for announcement)
Floris van Doorn (Aug 04 2025 at 15:17):
This is really great news! Congratulations, and thanks to the work you and others put into this.
Matthew Ballard (Aug 04 2025 at 15:18):
There are many people and organizations to thank for support including the Lean Community, the maintainers team particularly @Heather Macbeth , and the Lean FRO!
Patrick Massot (Aug 04 2025 at 15:25):
I was in Pittsburgh all of last year and I can tell everybody here that Jeremy Avigad put an insane amount of work into this. Of course many people worked on this, but this institute wouldn’t exist without Jeremy’s passion for helping other people getting a great environment to enjoy science in general and formal methods in particular.
Jeremy Avigad (Aug 04 2025 at 15:35):
If we tried to acknowledge all the people who helped make this happen, the list would be endless. The program directors at the NSF were heroic in finding a way to make this work in the current environment. We had business managers waking up in the middle of the night to work on paperwork. And the real work is just about to begin! We will lean on all of you in the months ahead.
Alex Kontorovich (Aug 04 2025 at 21:23):
Fantastic news, Congrats to all involved!!!
Matthew Ballard (Jan 03 2026 at 22:29):
To spoil the best part of our booth check out the animation @David Renshaw made for
of the evolution of blueprint dependency graph for some familiar projects: https://youtu.be/tLHuVh7-G_8?si=iwxNAHuf-xtFrl8s
David Renshaw (Jan 13 2026 at 20:06):
I have published the code that I used to make these animations: https://github.com/icarm/animate-blueprint-depgraph
Matthew Ballard (Feb 18 2026 at 17:12):
ICARM's zulip instance at icarm.zulipchat.com is now live. We are currently hosting a discussion on the 1stproof.org project. One striking aspect to me is that right now the only seemingly-credible attempt outside of the major labs is from @Tomodovodoo who used Aristotle to formalize his solution. (Lots of other variables and taste here + things can change so please take any value judgement in the previous sentence with much salt.) Without Lean, I don't think that happens.
You can view the web-public discussion from anywhere. If you want to participate, please sign up at https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSeY2HIkz4COUiBrA_Yp6X_mCQ7I43tEMtu4dA6putps2FDHJw/viewform
Matthew Ballard (Feb 18 2026 at 17:59):
I should add I am withholding any judgement on the accuracy of the formalization of the statement only because ICARM is the host. I encourage other experts to join and discuss
Last updated: Feb 28 2026 at 14:05 UTC