Zulip Chat Archive
Stream: general
Topic: Floating point
Ben Sherman (May 21 2018 at 20:46):
Does Lean have any support for floating point? Just for computation, not necessarily reasoning?
Andrew Ashworth (May 21 2018 at 21:00):
there's a preliminary floating point implementation in mathlib, but as i'm sure you know, there's way less to reason about with that vs the rational numbers
Andrew Ashworth (May 21 2018 at 21:00):
you'll want to ask @Mario Carneiro more about that
Ben Sherman (May 21 2018 at 21:03):
Oh, neat: https://github.com/leanprover/mathlib/blob/master/data/fp/basic.lean
Thanks for pointing that out to me!
Unfortunately, I was looking for something that just reduced to underlying floating point computation, so I'd have things like log
there. Maybe I can somehow use the FFI?
Andrew Ashworth (May 21 2018 at 21:06):
uh, there's an FFI? the API in lean/src/api
is for external C++ programs to call
Andrew Ashworth (May 21 2018 at 21:07):
unfortunately in this case if you really need floats in a theorem prover Coq is the best bet for now...
Ben Sherman (May 21 2018 at 21:26):
Well, actually, in Coq, I'd just write the program on reals and then extract the code to floating point
Andrew Ashworth (May 21 2018 at 21:29):
I'm hoping Lean 4 really improves in that regard. I can't use Lean for a lot of math-type things because it doesn't have a fast float/rational
Andrew Ashworth (May 21 2018 at 21:31):
even if proving correctness with IEEE floats is a gigantic pain, handwaving and going from real to float is good enough, as you said
Andrew Ashworth (May 21 2018 at 21:32):
but one of the bigger goals for the next version of Lean is better support for program extraction and a C++ FFI (I think), so I'm optimistic
Mario Carneiro (May 21 2018 at 23:48):
This is a compilation issue. Lean would need native support for floating point numbers. I think this is coming with the Lean 4 compiler.
Mario Carneiro (May 22 2018 at 00:39):
By the way there's nothing in principle stopping us from having log
available on floats, in fact once the rounding is done right pretty much all the functions have the same definition in terms of their real counterparts - apply function, round, special behavior at inf and nan.
Mario Carneiro (May 22 2018 at 00:40):
(Although I recall hearing that some IEEE functions are impossible to round correctly, i.e. the spec requires solving an undecidable problem.)
Last updated: Dec 20 2023 at 11:08 UTC