Zulip Chat Archive

Stream: general

Topic: Four Color Theorem


Jason Rute (Dec 22 2022 at 00:14):

I wonder what it would take to formalize this (or to find the error). https://mobile.twitter.com/VinceVatter/status/1605528265288028160

Jason Rute (Dec 22 2022 at 00:28):

HN: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34082022

Jason Rute (Dec 22 2022 at 00:30):

Reddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/math/comments/zruc58/221209835_a_nonconstructive_proof_of_the_four/

Anatole Dedecker (Dec 22 2022 at 00:38):

New speedrun category: formalize a proof of the Four Color Theorem, any%

Jason Rute (Dec 22 2022 at 00:43):

Mastodon: https://mathstodon.xyz/@tao/109554420101377184 I think the skepticism is increasing on this “proof”.

Yaël Dillies (Dec 22 2022 at 07:45):

Formalising this was actually discussed on Xena yesterday!

Yaël Dillies (Dec 22 2022 at 07:46):

Current conclusion is that we have enough people understanding the combinatorics but not enough people understanding the complex analysis.

Martin Dvořák (Dec 22 2022 at 10:16):

I had no idea that this proof exists! However, the old proof was successfully formalized in Coq.
https://www.ams.org/notices/200811/tx081101382p.pdf

Yaël Dillies (Dec 22 2022 at 10:55):

Yes, which is why we're talking about speedrunning :smile:

Patrick Massot (Dec 22 2022 at 11:00):

Frankly, the comments on internet suggest there is nothing to formalize here.

Martin Dvořák (Dec 22 2022 at 11:01):

What do you mean?

Yaël Dillies (Dec 22 2022 at 11:02):

The community hasn't yet reached a consensus that the proof is correct. And it might reach the opposite consensus instead.

Yaël Dillies (Dec 22 2022 at 11:03):

However, some of the prerequisites (Tutte and chromatic polynomials) for the proof are in sight for my LeanCamCombi project, so I might tick them off in case the proof becomes formalisable in the future.


Last updated: Dec 20 2023 at 11:08 UTC