Zulip Chat Archive
Stream: general
Topic: Implicit pairwise arguments
Yaël Dillies (Dec 11 2021 at 17:05):
I'm changing docs#set.pairwise from ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ s, x ≠ y → r x y
to ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → ∀ ⦃y⦄, y ∈ s → x ≠ y → r x y
. Should I do the same to docs#pairwise?
Mario Carneiro (Dec 12 2021 at 22:42):
There is no analogue of that change for docs#pairwise, since there are no membership assumptions in that case
Yaël Dillies (Dec 12 2021 at 22:48):
I don't know what you want to call it, if not "analog", but here's the change I want to make:
- Currently:
∀ i j, i ≠ j → r i j
- What I want:
∀ ⦃i j⦄, i ≠ j → r i j
Eric Wieser (Dec 12 2021 at 22:50):
I'd caution against changing both in the same PR
Last updated: Dec 20 2023 at 11:08 UTC