Zulip Chat Archive

Stream: general

Topic: State monad invariant


view this post on Zulip Nicholas Scheel (Jul 17 2018 at 14:24):

I been wondering if there’s a way to encode invariants on monadic state computations in Lean, such that every update to the state must preserve those invariants? I haven’t actually make use of monads in a DTT language before, but it seems like a good way to verify systems.

Maybe the two ways would be to build a new state monad with a proof term on the state ... wait I suppose that’s the same as using psigma for state, right?

verifiedStateChange {s : Type} {p : s -> Prop} (s0 : s) (p0 : p s0) : psigma p

Or working to verify that each building block preserves the invariant ...

Has anyone done this before? Are there examples out there?

view this post on Zulip Sebastian Ullrich (Jul 17 2018 at 14:31):

The preferred style for program verification in Lean and similar systems seems to be to separate programs and proofs as much as possible. But if you wanted to, you could use state_t with a subtype (which is equivalent to a psigma into Prop), yes.


Last updated: May 16 2021 at 05:21 UTC