# Zulip Chat Archive

## Stream: general

### Topic: Use list as an argument

#### Blair Shi (Jul 11 2018 at 08:36):

I define a function which takes a list as a argument but I do not know why it always break when I use it in my other theorem or function.

my function no error:

def f_span (l : list V) : set V := span {vc : V | vc ∈ l}

use it later in

def are_basis_equal (l₀ : list V) (l₁ : list V) : Prop := ∀vc : V, vc ∈ (f_span l₀) ∧ vc ∈ (f_span l₁)

it reports error :

[Lean] type mismatch at application f_span l₀ term l₀ has type list V : Type v but is expected to have type Type ? : Type (?+1)

#### Kevin Buzzard (Jul 11 2018 at 08:46):

You have some variable `V`

somewhere, I guess?

#### Kevin Buzzard (Jul 11 2018 at 08:46):

If you look at what you wrote as the definition of `f_span`

then it *looks* like it is expecting one input, namely `l`

of type `list V`

#### Kevin Buzzard (Jul 11 2018 at 08:47):

But after the definition of `f_span`

, if you write `#check f_span`

you will probably see a different story!

#### Kevin Buzzard (Jul 11 2018 at 08:47):

Probably `f_span`

is also expecting you to input `V`

itself. So that's my guess as to what your error is caused by -- you need `f_span V l_0`

#### Kevin Buzzard (Jul 11 2018 at 08:48):

The trick is to make `V`

a `{}`

variable; then `f_span`

won't ask for it. I've got to run but that's the idea

#### Sean Leather (Jul 11 2018 at 08:59):

But after the definition of

`f_span`

, if you write`#check f_span`

you will probably see a different story!

Even better would be to write `#check @f_span`

. That fills in those pesky metavariables with something readable.

#### Blair Shi (Jul 11 2018 at 09:17):

I added more argument using `[]`

and it works now. thank you !

#### Sean Leather (Jul 11 2018 at 09:21):

@Blair Shi Can you show us what it looks like now?

#### Blair Shi (Jul 11 2018 at 09:39):

def f_span (l : list V) : set V := span {vc : V | vc ∈ l} def are_basis_equal (l₀ : list V) (l₁ : list V) : Prop := ∀vc : V, vc ∈ (f_span k V l₀) ∧ vc ∈ (f_span k V l₁)

I just added k V everywhere when I using the function `f_span`

without any change of `f_span`

Because if you check my `f_span`

, the type is

f_span : Π (k : Type u_1) (V : Type u_2) [_inst_1 : field k] [_inst_2 : ring k] [_inst_3 : module k V], list V → set V

I also tried like added `(k : Type u_1) (V : Type u_2) [_inst_1 : field k] [_inst_2 : ring k] [_inst_3 : module k V]`

all of them as arguments to my `f_span`

but I realized I don't need to do so. But adding arguments also works for me.

#### Patrick Massot (Jul 11 2018 at 09:43):

Are you sure you're not duplicating stuff around https://github.com/leanprover/mathlib/blob/master/linear_algebra/basic.lean#L122?

#### Blair Shi (Jul 11 2018 at 09:52):

@Patrick Massot because the vector space in mathlib does not support finite dimensional vector space. I am currently working on finite dimensional vector space and in the definition of finite dimensional vector space, the basis is a list.

#### Blair Shi (Jul 11 2018 at 09:57):

@Sean Leather

I realized I have wrote the global variables and if I delete them the code does not work

variables (k : Type u) (V : Type v) variable [field k] variables [ring k] [module k V] variables (a : k) (b : V) include k

#### Patrick Massot (Jul 11 2018 at 10:00):

Ok. I remember we had this discussion about ordering basis elements here.

#### Mario Carneiro (Jul 11 2018 at 10:10):

You want `variables {k : Type u} {V : Type v}`

in the first line

#### Blair Shi (Jul 11 2018 at 10:23):

I change it to be `{k : Type u} {V : Type v}`

as you said. Now I delete all `k V`

when I use the function:)

#### Kevin Buzzard (Jul 11 2018 at 10:24):

ordering basis elements -- it's a funny situation! In the general case you seem to want a basis to be a set. But to prove the standard undergraduate theorems about linear maps = matrices you seem to want the basis to be a finite totally ordered set.

#### Kevin Buzzard (Jul 11 2018 at 10:26):

@Blair Shi yes -- if you are doing vector spaces over a field field `k`

then you don't want to have to keep mentioning `k`

. If you're doing `k`

-linear maps between vector spaces `V`

and `W`

then you probably want to mention `V`

but if you're doing things with a fixed `V`

like showing that sets of size less than dim(V) can't span then you might not even want to mention `V`

. This is how those `{}`

and `()`

brackets that I talked about in my lecture on Monday work in practice. There are tricks to change the variable from `()`

to `{}`

and back in the middle of a file which I can tell you about later if you need them.

Last updated: Aug 03 2023 at 10:10 UTC