Zulip Chat Archive
Stream: general
Topic: central localizations
Reid Barton (Sep 09 2020 at 11:32):
It would be useful to generalize our theory of localizations of commutative monoids to localizations of arbitrary monoids at a central submonoid. This is nicely written up in this nlab page.
How should we manage the "central" hypothesis though? Do we have anything like this already, perhaps in the context of polynomials?
Reid Barton (Sep 09 2020 at 11:38):
Possibilities include using bundled central submonoids (but this sounds sort of annoying in the common case of a commutative ring?) or a type class is_central {M : Type*} [monoid M] (S : submonoid M)
(but we always seem to change our minds about using type classes eventually?)
Kevin Buzzard (Sep 09 2020 at 11:43):
We bundled normal subgroups as well as subgroups when we made the group theory game
Reid Barton (Sep 09 2020 at 11:43):
OK, good example because every subgroup of an abelian group is also normal.
Kevin Buzzard (Sep 09 2020 at 11:44):
I was expecting it to be annoying but it wasn't too bad
Reid Barton (Sep 09 2020 at 11:44):
so currently in group_theory.quotient_group
I see
variables {G : Type u} [group G] (N : subgroup G) [nN : N.normal]
Kevin Buzzard (Sep 09 2020 at 11:44):
yeah
Reid Barton (Sep 09 2020 at 11:44):
where normal
is apparently a structure-class
Kevin Buzzard (Sep 09 2020 at 11:44):
but over the summer some students and I proved Sylow 1 from scratch
Kevin Buzzard (Sep 09 2020 at 11:45):
like literally our own definition of group
Reid Barton (Sep 09 2020 at 11:45):
with an instance lemma normal_of_comm {G : Type*} [comm_group G] (H : subgroup G) : H.normal
Kevin Buzzard (Sep 09 2020 at 11:45):
https://github.com/ImperialCollegeLondon/group-theory-game
Kevin Buzzard (Sep 09 2020 at 11:45):
and in that repo we bundled normal subgroups.
Reid Barton (Sep 09 2020 at 11:45):
ah, I see
Kevin Buzzard (Sep 09 2020 at 11:46):
and so we could have subgroup.comap
and normal.comap
Reid Barton (Sep 09 2020 at 11:47):
For that matter, I wonder what the odd order formalization did here
Reid Barton (Sep 09 2020 at 11:52):
It could be that there are very few places currently where we actually build a submonoid that will end up getting passed to localization
Johan Commelin (Sep 09 2020 at 11:57):
Probably in the construction of fraction fields, localisation at a prime, ..., and that's it?
Reid Barton (Sep 09 2020 at 12:03):
There's also inverting a single element. That one would need the element to be central, and I guess the two you mentioned need a commutative ring to be sensible.
Reid Barton (Sep 09 2020 at 12:08):
OK, so the bundled option seems painless enough...
Reid Barton (Sep 09 2020 at 13:02):
Is it worth doing https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/Ore+localization? I don't have any use for it currently but I was vaguely aware of its existence (it's somewhat related to homotopy categories).
Kevin Buzzard (Sep 09 2020 at 13:40):
It shows up in non-abelian Iwasawa theory as well
Last updated: Dec 20 2023 at 11:08 UTC