Zulip Chat Archive
Stream: maths
Topic: FLT for n=3
Kevin Buzzard (Feb 10 2022 at 19:13):
There is a pretty clunky proof arguing only within that the only solutions to in integers are the obvious ones, but the natural proof (a descent on the elliptic curve) works in the unique factorization domain . Do we have FLT for in mathlib? A student here who has done a bunch of Lean already is looking for a project and this might be a cool one. But one thing I'm stuck on is that a natural start would be to make this ring (I think it's called the Eisenstein Integers) and prove it's a Euclidean domain (in fact a summer project student did this for me this summer as part of her MSc, but never PR'ed it). But is there a home for this ring in mathlib or are people going to tell me to use the integers of , which will be much harder to work with (but certainly not impossible).
Alex J. Best (Feb 10 2022 at 19:16):
This was discussed fairly recently in the flt regular stream (no link due to mobile sorry) but it seems @Ruben Van de Velde has it at https://github.com/Ruben-VandeVelde/flt/blob/main/src/euler.lean at least
Kevin Buzzard (Feb 10 2022 at 19:17):
Oh nice! This looks like the clunky proof :-)
Eric Rodriguez (Feb 10 2022 at 19:18):
discussion is around here
Ruben Van de Velde (Feb 10 2022 at 20:50):
Clunky is the right word, certainly. It doesn't quite manage to stay in , though Euler may have thought so - I ended up writing more code about (which isn't a UFD, but somehow "close enough") than about
Riccardo Brasca (Feb 10 2022 at 20:53):
Also on mobile
Riccardo Brasca (Feb 10 2022 at 20:53):
But it seems "case I" is doable, but for "case II" one has to work
Kevin Buzzard (Feb 11 2022 at 07:54):
Actually this issue isn't going away despite FLT3 being done; over the summer I'll have a student thinking about cubic reciprocity and here all the statements are in this ring of Eisenstein integers. Is there a case for just making a new definition? Universe-polymorphic obviously ;-)
Riccardo Brasca (Feb 11 2022 at 07:57):
In flt-regular
we are very close to prove that ring of integers of a cyclotomic extension is what it is. I am sure it will be in mathlib before the summer.
Last updated: Dec 20 2023 at 11:08 UTC