Zulip Chat Archive
Stream: maths
Topic: FTC-2 on open set
James Arthur (Jan 09 2021 at 16:26):
Hi, I'm working on the area of the unit circle, part of Freek problem 9. I came stuck when I needed to do an integral from -1 to 1 and the derivatives of and are not well defined at the limits of integration. So I needed a new flavour of FTC-2 where is differentiable over instead of . I have a statement, but not a proof.
import measure_theory.interval_integral
open set interval_integral
variables {β E F : Type*} [measurable_space E] [normed_group E] {f : ℝ → E}
{c ca cb : E} {a b z : ℝ} {u v ua ub va vb : β → ℝ} {f' : ℝ → E} [normed_space ℝ E]
[borel_space E] [complete_space E] [topological_space.second_countable_topology E]
theorem FTC_but_with_open_set (hcont : continuous_on f (interval a b))
(hderiv : ∀ x ∈ Ioo (min a b) (max a b), has_deriv_at f (f' x) x)
(hcont' : continuous_on f' (interval a b)) (hmeas' : ae_measurable f') :
∫ y in a..b, f' y = f b - f a :=
begin
sorry
end
Is there a nice and easy way to do this. My current proof goes like this, take , split at the midpoint into and , then apply a flavour of integral_eq_sub_of_has_deriv_right
, then I should be basically home dry.
Heather Macbeth (Jan 09 2021 at 17:06):
I don't know what the cleanest way is to get this fact. But I hope the hypothesis hcont
can be weakened to continuous_within_at f (interval a b) a
and continuous_within_at f (interval a b) b
(the interior continuity should follow from the other hypotheses).
Heather Macbeth (Jan 10 2021 at 16:33):
I think one way to do this is to apply the dominated convergence theorem
docs#measure_theory.tendsto_integral_of_dominated_convergence
to approximate ∫ y in a..b, f' y
as ∫ y in (A n)..b, f' y
where the sequence A n
tends to a
, and then apply the original FTC-2 on each of the intervals .
Is there an easier way? @Yury G. Kudryashov @Patrick Massot
Yury G. Kudryashov (Jan 11 2021 at 03:39):
Do you need a better FTC-2 or a better has_deriv_within_at
?
Heather Macbeth (Jan 11 2021 at 03:41):
I think the point is that, while it's true that has right derivative 0 at -1, it's not easy to prove with our current tools. Or is there a way I'm missing?
Yury G. Kudryashov (Jan 11 2021 at 03:47):
You can apply l'Hopital
Yury G. Kudryashov (Jan 11 2021 at 03:48):
with denominator
Yury G. Kudryashov (Jan 11 2021 at 03:48):
Or use some theorem from extend_deriv
Yury G. Kudryashov (Jan 11 2021 at 03:49):
E.g., docs#has_deriv_at_interval_left_endpoint_of_tendsto_deriv
Heather Macbeth (Jan 11 2021 at 03:53):
Ah, nice! @James Arthur :up:
Benjamin Davidson (Jan 11 2021 at 04:00):
That would certainly be easier than writing a version of FTC-2 for the open set, correct? I couldn't come up with any straightforward way to do the latter. Although if someone does have a good idea for how to prove FTC-2 for the open set I do think it would be a worthwhile addition regardless.
Heather Macbeth (Jan 11 2021 at 04:03):
I think the open set version can be deduced from the existing version of FTC-2 plus the theorem that Yury linked! docs#has_deriv_at_interval_left_endpoint_of_tendsto_deriv
And maybe that would be a useful addition (I'll defer to Yury).
Benjamin Davidson (Jan 11 2021 at 04:10):
Hmm...I'm a little confused as to how one would apply docs#has_deriv_at_interval_left_endpoint_of_tendsto_deriv here
James Arthur (Jan 11 2021 at 09:45):
That sounds brilliant, but is that the only solution? Is there a way to get this FTC-2, which seems a useful result?
Yury G. Kudryashov (Jan 11 2021 at 19:07):
You can do it for any function, so you can get FTC-2 (with has_deriv_at
instead of has_deriv_within_at
)
Yury G. Kudryashov (Jan 11 2021 at 19:08):
Just use has_deriv_at_interval_left_endpoint_of_tendsto_deriv
to get the missing derivative at the left endpoint.
Benjamin Davidson (Jan 14 2021 at 04:55):
Solved! #5733
Last updated: Dec 20 2023 at 11:08 UTC