Zulip Chat Archive
Stream: maths
Topic: LinearOrderedField with StarRing : TrivialStar
MohanadAhmed (Aug 05 2023 at 14:05):
Is any of the following statements true:
Given a LinearOrderedField
with StarRing
can I either show it has a TrivialStar
(Like R and Q) or it is a StarOrderedRing?
Or equivalently to number 1 as expressed by @Eric Wieser given a ring homomorphism that is involutive can we show that it is the identity map?
instance inst1 [LinearOrderedField R] [StarRing R] : TrivialStar R := sorry
instance inst2 [LinearOrderedField R] [StarRing R] : StarOrderedRing R := sorry
example [LinearOrderedField R] (f : R →+* R) (hf : Function.Involutive f) : f = RingHom.id R
:= sorry
Kevin Buzzard (Aug 05 2023 at 15:40):
How about R=Q(sqrt(2)) with the ordering coming from the embedding into the reals sending sqrt(2) to the positive real square root, and f is the function sending +sqrt(2) to -sqrt(2)?
Eric Wieser (Aug 05 2023 at 19:19):
Nice, in retrospect that's an obvious counterexample
Kevin Buzzard (Aug 05 2023 at 19:20):
in mathematics an awful lot of things are obvious in retrospect, it's a very P != NP place.
MohanadAhmed (Aug 06 2023 at 15:56):
If I understand this correctly, what you are saying is:
Let
Let
The is involutive but not trivial and the field is linearly ordered by embedding in $$\mathbb{R}$. So this kills 1 and 3. And for StarOrderedRing we will not be able to find such that hence not a starOrderedRing.
Thanks
Kevin Buzzard (Aug 06 2023 at 16:05):
Kevin Buzzard (Aug 06 2023 at 16:05):
Kevin Buzzard (Aug 06 2023 at 16:08):
I don't really know all these star definitions but it's not a StarOrderedRing because the <= structure coming from the reals and the xx* structure coming from the star are totally unrelated.
Last updated: Dec 20 2023 at 11:08 UTC