Zulip Chat Archive
Stream: maths
Topic: Non-injective change of variables in integrals
Yury G. Kudryashov (Oct 15 2023 at 20:24):
In #7693 I prove that , where , , , is the volume of a unit ball in .
I wanted to have this formula for any f
, not necessarily integrable, so the proof works in two steps: transfer the measure from to , then projection to the first coordinate.
Yury G. Kudryashov (Oct 15 2023 at 20:25):
It would be easier to prove that the push-forward of the Lebesgue measure on E
under norm is the Lebesgue measure on real numbers with given density.
Yury G. Kudryashov (Oct 15 2023 at 20:25):
But this way the result will require f
to be integrable.
Yury G. Kudryashov (Oct 15 2023 at 20:27):
@Sebastien Gouezel I know that you formalized a very advanced version of the change of variables formula. Is it true in case of a non-injective map (e.g., provided that we know that the push-forward in the Lebesgue measure with some density)?
Yury G. Kudryashov (Oct 15 2023 at 20:28):
If yes, how much different is the proof?
Geoffrey Irving (Oct 15 2023 at 20:49):
(deleted)
Sebastien Gouezel (Oct 16 2023 at 06:07):
If you already know the push-forward, then I guess the formula you want doesn't need anything more. docs#MeasureTheory.integral_map, for instance?
Yury G. Kudryashov (Oct 16 2023 at 16:54):
This lemma assumes that f
is AEStronglyMeasurable
.
Yury G. Kudryashov (Oct 16 2023 at 16:55):
We have a version without this assumption if φ
is a measurable embedding. It is also true for Prod.fst
, Prod.snd
, and norm.
Yury G. Kudryashov (Oct 16 2023 at 16:57):
I wonder if there is a class of maps that generalizes Prod.fst
/Prod.snd
/norm
. The only difficulty is to prove that AEStronglyMeasurable (f ∘ φ)
implies AEStronglyMeasurable f
under some assumptions on φ
.
Sebastien Gouezel (Oct 16 2023 at 18:10):
Ah, sorry, I had missed the difficulty. Indeed, that's a good question!
Anatole Dedecker (Oct 16 2023 at 20:09):
"Has a measurable section" is the most natural thing that comes to mind and it seems to encompass your three use cases (assuming you mean nnnorm
, but I don’t think the result could be true for norm
)
Yury G. Kudryashov (Oct 17 2023 at 02:20):
How does a measurable section help?
Yury G. Kudryashov (Oct 17 2023 at 02:20):
Note that we need a statement about NullMeasurableSet
s, not MeasurableSet
s.
Yury G. Kudryashov (Oct 17 2023 at 02:21):
If we drop f
, then the lemma we need is NullMeasurableSet (φ ⁻¹' s) μ <-> NullMeasurableSet s (μ.map φ)
.
Yury G. Kudryashov (Oct 17 2023 at 02:21):
(unless I miss something; I didn't formalize the implication)
Felix Weilacher (Oct 17 2023 at 03:59):
Is this different than what was being discussed in this thread?
Felix Weilacher (Oct 17 2023 at 04:00):
For example we showed there that if phi is a measurable map between standard Borel spaces with Borel image, then it is a quotient map for the null-measurable algebras
Felix Weilacher (Oct 17 2023 at 04:10):
And actually I think any measurable map will work.
Yury G. Kudryashov (Oct 17 2023 at 05:41):
Sorry, I forgot that I've already asked this question. I'll read the proof again tomorrow (have a test to grade ASAP).
Xavier Roblot (Oct 17 2023 at 08:33):
Yury G. Kudryashov said:
In #7693 I prove that , where , , , is the volume of a unit ball in .
I wanted to have this formula for anyf
, not necessarily integrable, so the proof works in two steps: transfer the measure from to , then projection to the first coordinate.
Lately, I have been trying to prove a similar formula (which much less success than you :sweat_smile: ) since it provides a way to compute volume of unit balls in (and also ) for the norm (and also in mixed setting which is the one I really need). Is this something that you are planning to add?
Yury G. Kudryashov (Oct 17 2023 at 16:23):
Could you please give more details?
Yury G. Kudryashov (Oct 17 2023 at 16:24):
I mean, how do you want to compute the volume of the unit ball?
Xavier Roblot (Oct 17 2023 at 19:54):
To compute the volume of the unit ball for the norm , you take , so you get where is the dimension. Then, you can compute all the integrals (that are equal to values of the Gamma function) and solve for .
I think that works but I might be missing something.
Yury G. Kudryashov (Oct 18 2023 at 03:20):
Where does come from in this computation?
Yury G. Kudryashov (Oct 18 2023 at 03:20):
From some value of the Gamma function?
Yury G. Kudryashov (Oct 18 2023 at 03:25):
I guess, it comes from Gamma(1/2)
Yury G. Kudryashov (Oct 18 2023 at 04:17):
I meant, in the case p=2.
Xavier Roblot (Oct 18 2023 at 07:10):
Yes, the case p = 2 is done here: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Volume_of_an_n-ball#Gaussian_integrals
Xavier Roblot (Oct 18 2023 at 07:11):
I guess I'll formalize these computations since I am the one that needs them.
Xavier Roblot (Oct 30 2023 at 08:35):
Last updated: Dec 20 2023 at 11:08 UTC