Zulip Chat Archive
Stream: maths
Topic: injectivity of localization map
Filippo A. E. Nuccio (Sep 10 2020 at 12:24):
I have a domain and its field of fractions with the localization map and I am trying to use its injectivity to shows that two elements are equal knowing that they are equal in , so that . But I guess I am poorly using the command submonoid.localization_map.to_map_injective
. Indeed, If I apply apply submonoid.localization_map.to_map_injective f
I get the error `type mismatch at application
submonoid.localization_map.to_map_injective f
term f has type
fraction_map R K : Type (max u_1 u_2)
but is expected to have type
?m_6.to_map = ?m_7.to_map : Prop`
If I try to read the error, it seems to me that it wants a proof that two things are equal, but the syntax seems to suggest that it wants a proof that two localization maps coincide. Is it the case?
Reid Barton (Sep 10 2020 at 12:25):
based on the error message, what if you just delete f
?
Filippo A. E. Nuccio (Sep 10 2020 at 12:26):
invalid apply tactic, failed to unify
a = x
with
?m_6 = ?m_7
Reid Barton (Sep 10 2020 at 12:27):
Oh, this is not the lemma you want--it says that the function assigning to a localization_map
its underlying function is injective.
Filippo A. E. Nuccio (Sep 10 2020 at 12:27):
and If I replace f with the proof that (called haxf
) it becomes
`type mismatch at application
submonoid.localization_map.to_map_injective haxf
term haxf
has type
⇑(localization_map.to_map f) a = ⇑(localization_map.to_map f) x
but is expected to have type
?m_6.to_map = ?m_7.to_map
`
Filippo A. E. Nuccio (Sep 10 2020 at 12:27):
Ah, I see!
Filippo A. E. Nuccio (Sep 10 2020 at 12:27):
It makes sense with the error I get.
Reid Barton (Sep 10 2020 at 12:28):
Looks like the one you want is docs#fraction_map.injective
Filippo A. E. Nuccio (Sep 10 2020 at 12:30):
Great! I am trying now...
Filippo A. E. Nuccio (Sep 10 2020 at 12:31):
YES! Thanks so much!
Kevin Buzzard (Sep 10 2020 at 13:33):
Everything is set up in perhaps a slightly confusing way for people who think about stuff like fields of fractions in a very concrete way. We've seen situations where we want isomorphic non-equal things to both be "the" field of fractions of something in mathematics, so we have a concrete story where we give an example field of fractions and also a universal theory where we develop some of the theory for anything satisfying the universal property.
Last updated: Dec 20 2023 at 11:08 UTC