Zulip Chat Archive
Stream: maths
Topic: notation for finite free modules
Kevin Buzzard (Aug 22 2018 at 10:29):
Some students here have developed the basic theory of free modules of finite rank over a ring (which later becomes a commutative ring and then a field). One issue I have with their work is that they are still using some placeholder notation for the fundamental construction of , the free rank module over the ring . What should the function which takes a ring R
and a natural n
and returns the R
-module R^n
be called? Any suggestions?
Reid Barton (Aug 22 2018 at 14:19):
I guess there are two questions: name, and notation
Reid Barton (Aug 22 2018 at 14:20):
For notation, assuming we can't use R^n
, how about R^⊕n
?
Johan Commelin (Aug 22 2018 at 14:25):
Why can't we use R^n
? As for the name, how about finite_free_module R n
?
Reid Barton (Aug 22 2018 at 14:34):
Maybe we can use R^n
, but in that case I assumed there was no choice to be made :)
Last updated: Dec 20 2023 at 11:08 UTC