Zulip Chat Archive
Stream: maths
Topic: notation for finite free modules
Kevin Buzzard (Aug 22 2018 at 10:29):
Some students here have developed the basic theory of free modules of finite rank over a ring (which later becomes a commutative ring and then a field). One issue I have with their work is that they are still using some placeholder notation for the fundamental construction of , the free rank module over the ring . What should the function which takes a ring R and a natural n and returns the R-module R^n be called? Any suggestions?
Reid Barton (Aug 22 2018 at 14:19):
I guess there are two questions: name, and notation
Reid Barton (Aug 22 2018 at 14:20):
For notation, assuming we can't use R^n, how about R^⊕n?
Johan Commelin (Aug 22 2018 at 14:25):
Why can't we use R^n? As for the name, how about finite_free_module R n?
Reid Barton (Aug 22 2018 at 14:34):
Maybe we can use R^n, but in that case I assumed there was no choice to be made :)
Last updated: May 02 2025 at 03:31 UTC