Zulip Chat Archive

Stream: maths

Topic: null_of_locally_null


Yury G. Kudryashov (Jan 14 2022 at 04:19):

@Sebastien Gouezel I see that the assumption of docs#measure_theory.null_of_locally_null intersects with s twice: first when it says that u belongs to neighborhoods within s, then once more explicitly.

Yury G. Kudryashov (Jan 14 2022 at 04:19):

Is it intentional?

Sebastien Gouezel (Jan 14 2022 at 07:39):

No, I don't think it's intentional. The lemma is perfectly usable as it is now, though, and removing one intersection or the other would arguably make it weaker formally, so I don't know if it's worth changing. Don't hesitate to PR a change if you think another version is easier to use!

Yury G. Kudryashov (Jan 14 2022 at 16:28):

I'm going to move it to outer_measure anyway (so that applying it to map f μ doesn't require f to be measurable). I'll make a PR later today or tomorrow.

Yury G. Kudryashov (Jan 14 2022 at 16:30):

I use it to prove that a function is either a.e.-constant, or admits two disjoint balls in the codomain such that the preimages of both balls have positive measure (and I'm going to use this that in case of a strictly convex codomain, ∥∫ x, f x∥ < ∫ x, ∥f x∥ unless f is a.e.-constant).


Last updated: Dec 20 2023 at 11:08 UTC