Zulip Chat Archive
Stream: maths
Topic: paracompact spaces
Yury G. Kudryashov (Feb 24 2021 at 02:49):
Hi, I've formalized a few facts about paracompact spaces in branch#paracompact, thanks a lot @Reid Barton for writing a roadmap with useful links. I'm going to fix docs and PR it tonight. I'm going to add the following lemmas/instances (checkmarks show already formalized lemmas):
- [X]
compact_space
→paracompact_space
; - [X]
locally_compact_space
→sigma_compact_space
→t2_space
→paracompact_space
; - [X]
emetric_space
→paracompact_space
; - [ ]
paracompact_space
→t2_space
→normal_space
.
Which of them should be instances? Should I add more instances/lemmas (besides partition of unity which is planned for the next PR)?
Yury G. Kudryashov (Feb 24 2021 at 02:49):
The PR will depend on #6328
Yury G. Kudryashov (Feb 24 2021 at 05:17):
@Patrick Massot @Sebastien Gouezel @Heather Macbeth :up:
Yury G. Kudryashov (Mar 02 2021 at 00:28):
For "metric spaces are paracompact" I formalized the proof by Mary Ellen Rudin. She constructs the sets of the refinement as some infinite unions of balls. In some cases (e.g., for a proper metric space) it is possible to find a locally finite refinement such that all sets are open balls. Is it true in the general case? @Patrick Massot @Sebastien Gouezel
Last updated: Dec 20 2023 at 11:08 UTC