Zulip Chat Archive
Stream: maths
Topic: roption.dom vs multiplicity.finite
Johan Commelin (Dec 28 2020 at 11:59):
We have docs#multiplicity.finite and
lemma finite_iff_dom [decidable_rel ((∣) : α → α → Prop)] {a b : α} :
finite a b ↔ (multiplicity a b).dom := iff.rfl
what do people think of defining enat.finite instead (as abbreviation for roption.dom)?
Because data.nat.enat has many occurences of x.dom for some x : enat, and I think x.finite looks much better.
Johan Commelin (Dec 28 2020 at 12:10):
Maybe enat.finite shouldn't replace multiplicity.finite... both defs could coexist.
Last updated: May 02 2025 at 03:31 UTC