Zulip Chat Archive
Stream: PR reviews
Topic: !3#18732 Bergelson intersectivity
Yaël Dillies (Sep 13 2023 at 04:21):
This PR proving the Bergelson intersectivity lemma has been sitting for a little while (that's British for a long while). I'm only noticing today that it was erroneously marked as too-late
. Could one of our resident measure theorists have a look?
Yaël Dillies (Sep 13 2023 at 04:21):
@Yury G. Kudryashov has already reviewed. So maybe @Sebastien Gouezel will have thoughts?
Yury G. Kudryashov (Sep 13 2023 at 04:40):
I have 1 remaining concern: strong_bergelson
doesn't look like a mathlib name.
Yury G. Kudryashov (Sep 13 2023 at 04:40):
But I don't have better suggesions.
Yury G. Kudryashov (Sep 14 2023 at 05:20):
BTW, about density: should we have names for liminf
, limsup
, and the filter "s
has lower density 1
"?
Yury G. Kudryashov (Sep 14 2023 at 05:21):
With theorems like "frequently (filter) p iff liminf density > 0"
Yaël Dillies (Sep 14 2023 at 06:22):
Hmm, I'm having trouble parsing your message. Can you be more explicit? But I suspect the answer is "Yes, but once Yaël has written the general density API because it will generalise to a lot of densities".
Yury G. Kudryashov (Sep 14 2023 at 06:26):
What API do you have in mind?
Yury G. Kudryashov (Sep 14 2023 at 06:26):
E.g., how general is it going to be?
Yaël Dillies (Sep 14 2023 at 06:33):
Bhavik and I want to formalise the general framework coming from this paper. Not all densities fit into this framework (eg, the Schnirelmann density), but enough that I think it's worth it.
Last updated: Dec 20 2023 at 11:08 UTC