Zulip Chat Archive
Stream: Is there code for X?
Topic: Absolute values on polynomials
Fabrizio Barroero (Apr 26 2025 at 21:57):
Hi, I started formalising some of the content of this file because it is useful for heights in number theory.
Here is how I defined what’s called “Gauss Norm” in this notes:
import Mathlib
namespace Polynomial
variable {R α : Type*} [Semiring R] [Semiring α] [LinearOrder α]
(f : AbsoluteValue R α) (hna : IsNonarchimedean f)
def GaussNorm : R[X] → α := fun p ↦ if h : p.support.Nonempty then p.support.sup' h fun I ↦
(f (p.coeff i)) else 0
include hna in
theorem isNonarchimedean_GaussNorm [AddLeftMono α] : IsNonarchimedean (GaussNorm f) := sorry
end Polynomial
I have some API’s and plan to prove Theorem 7 in the notes.
I just would like to have some feedback on the definition and make sure that this is not already done somewhere else before I continue working on this and start making PRs.
Chris Birkbeck (Apr 27 2025 at 02:14):
So @William Coram has been working on defining this for restricted power series, so maybe talking with him would be useful.
Michael Stoll (Apr 27 2025 at 08:55):
I would perhaps not use f
to denote an absolute value (maybe v
instead), but otherwise this looks basically OK to me.
I think Mathlib style would prefer
def GaussNorm (p : R[X]) : α := if ...
Kevin Buzzard (Apr 27 2025 at 08:57):
For Theorem 7 you should prove the result for A a Dedekind domain with field of fractions K, rather than A = integers and K = rationals. (it will then apply to rings of integers of number fields, for example)
Ruben Van de Velde (Apr 27 2025 at 09:15):
Presumably def gaussNorm
Antoine Chambert-Loir (Apr 27 2025 at 09:20):
I'd want all Gauss norms, at any real scale ().
William Coram (Apr 27 2025 at 10:01):
As mentioned by Chris, I was working with defining this for restricted power series. I had
variable (c : ℝ) (R : Type*) [NormedRing R] [IsUltrametricDist R]
noncomputable
def gaussNormC : PowerSeries R → ℝ :=
fun f => sSup {‖coeff R i f‖ * c^i | (i : ℕ)}
I have shown this is a non-arch norm on restricted power series and (mostly shown) an absolute value on polynomials (for c nneg).
This work is a while form being properly PR'd as it is dependent on restricted power series being merged (and other commitments).
I had not planned on formalising any of the results in that file though, so we just need to agree on a definition that works.
Fabrizio Barroero (Apr 27 2025 at 13:41):
Thanks everyone for the feedback.
Fabrizio Barroero (Apr 27 2025 at 13:51):
William Coram said:
As mentioned by Chris, I was working with defining this for restricted power series. I had
variable (c : ℝ) (R : Type*) [NormedRing R] [IsUltrametricDist R] noncomputable def gaussNormC : PowerSeries R → ℝ := fun f => sSup {‖coeff R i f‖ * c^i | (i : ℕ)}
I have shown this is a non-arch norm on restricted power series and (mostly shown) an absolute value on polynomials (for c nneg).
This work is a while form being properly PR'd as it is dependent on restricted power series being merged (and other commitments).
I had not planned on formalising any of the results in that file though, so we just need to agree on a definition that works.
I see.. That's interesting!
We certainly should agree on a common definition.
Filippo A. E. Nuccio (Apr 28 2025 at 02:05):
Pinging @María Inés de Frutos Fernández who has worked a lot on related stuff.
Last updated: May 02 2025 at 03:31 UTC