Zulip Chat Archive
Stream: Is there code for X?
Topic: Cantor set, Cantor function?
Michael Rothgang (Sep 15 2023 at 08:07):
Is there a definition of the (standard) Cantor set and the (Vitali-Lebesgue-)Cantor staircase function --- or, aiming for the moon on a stick, even the following properties?
- is uncountable, nowhere dense and has measure zero
- is continuous
- is countable, so has measure
- (I don't need this, but it's still cool: a.e., so and is not absolutely continuous)
- huge bonus points for fat Cantor sets -- showing that nowhere dense doesn't imply Lebesgue measure zero
Then I could also state a counterexample to a lemma I'm currently formalizing. :-)
Kevin Buzzard (Sep 15 2023 at 13:25):
I don't know the answer to your actual question but I would recommend that you stop formalising the lemma.
Kevin Buzzard (Sep 15 2023 at 13:26):
As to your question, certainly most if not all of it would be accessible (and perhaps even easy and fun) given what we already have.
Michael Rothgang (Sep 15 2023 at 21:45):
Kevin Buzzard said:
I don't know the answer to your actual question but I would recommend that you stop formalising the lemma.
I've been imprecise: I wasn't trying to formulate a false statement - rather, it's an example why a particular hypothesis (some function being C¹) cannot be weakened.
Last updated: Dec 20 2023 at 11:08 UTC