Zulip Chat Archive
Stream: Is there code for X?
Topic: Continuity at isolated points
Yongxi Lin (Aaron) (Dec 07 2025 at 15:08):
Do we have a theorem similar to the following one?
import Mathlib
open TopologicalSpace Topology
variable {X Y : Type*} (f : X → Y) [TopologicalSpace X] [TopologicalSpace Y] (x : X) (s : Set X)
lemma Continuous_at_isolated_point (h : 𝓝[s \ { x }] x = ⊥) : ContinuousWithinAt f s x := by
rw [← continuousWithinAt_diff_self]
unfold ContinuousWithinAt
simp [h]
I think this is useful and happy to make a PR.
Aaron Liu (Dec 07 2025 at 15:10):
this should be called something like ContinuousWithinAt.of_isolated
Yongxi Lin (Aaron) (Dec 07 2025 at 15:12):
Sorry for still not being familiar with Mathlib's naming conventions :smiling_face_with_tear:
Yongxi Lin (Aaron) (Dec 07 2025 at 15:14):
Are you suggesting that I should change the name of the theorem I posted (when I make a PR) or there is an existing theorem named ContinuousWithinAt.of_isolated?
Aaron Liu (Dec 07 2025 at 15:24):
I guess both?
Aaron Liu (Dec 07 2025 at 15:24):
if it exists already that would be great too
Etienne Marion (Dec 07 2025 at 15:49):
@loogle nhdsWithin, (⊥ : Filter _), "cont"
loogle (Dec 07 2025 at 15:49):
:shrug: nothing found
Sébastien Gouëzel (Dec 07 2025 at 16:45):
It's maybe better to phrase it in terms of AccPt as in docs#fderivWithin_zero_of_not_accPt
Yongxi Lin (Aaron) (Dec 19 2025 at 00:25):
Last updated: Dec 20 2025 at 21:32 UTC