Zulip Chat Archive
Stream: Is there code for X?
Topic: Continuous linear equivs
Kevin Buzzard (Sep 16 2024 at 15:03):
I want bicontinuous isomorphisms between e.g. topological vector spaces (and more generally topological R-modules). Do we have these and if not, would a PR be welcome?
Eric Wieser (Sep 16 2024 at 15:04):
Kevin Buzzard (Sep 16 2024 at 15:07):
Oh perfect! Thanks!
Kevin Buzzard (Sep 16 2024 at 15:08):
Wait, I need the inverse map to be continuous too... aah, no, the axiom is there, it's just that somehow the name is not quite right maybe :-)
Eric Wieser (Sep 16 2024 at 16:18):
It's e.symm.continuous
Kevin Buzzard (Sep 16 2024 at 17:28):
Sure, I'm just noting that a ContinuousLinearEquiv is not a linear equiv which is continuous
Jireh Loreaux (Sep 16 2024 at 18:13):
What would you propose to call it instead Kevin?
Jireh Loreaux (Sep 16 2024 at 18:13):
HomeomorphLinearEquiv
?
Jireh Loreaux (Sep 16 2024 at 18:15):
I think we allow this naming because there is no reason for ContinuousLinearEquiv
to mean a LinearEquiv
that is continuous since (a) this doesn't have many nice properties as a type unto itself, and (b) e : E →ₗ[𝕜] F
and he : Continous e
is a perfectly fine spelling for the latter.
Heather Macbeth (Sep 16 2024 at 18:28):
And also because of the Banach open mapping theorem: in Banach spaces, the two are equivalent. docs#LinearEquiv.continuous_symm
Eric Wieser (Sep 16 2024 at 18:57):
One strong argument for the current ContinuousLinearEquiv
naming is that it matches the title you chose when you were looking for it :)
Kevin Buzzard (Sep 16 2024 at 19:47):
Yes but ironically when I actually searched, I searched for HomeomorphLinearEquiv :-)
Last updated: May 02 2025 at 03:31 UTC