Zulip Chat Archive
Stream: Is there code for X?
Topic: Product in `over X` vs fibered product
Adam Topaz (Apr 24 2021 at 13:47):
If X : C with C a category, do we have any way of relating the product of two (or more) objects in over X to the fibered product (over X) in C? @Scott Morrison @Bhavik Mehta
Bhavik Mehta (Apr 24 2021 at 14:33):
There's some stuff in constructions/over for this!
Bhavik Mehta (Apr 24 2021 at 14:33):
But I made that to show products in over X exist given the fibered products exist - it might not be the most convenient for relating between the two
Adam Topaz (Apr 24 2021 at 14:34):
Gotcha.
Bhavik Mehta (Apr 24 2021 at 14:35):
For the latter, I think there's something helpful buried deep in the topos project which I can try to dig up, but there ought to be something like this in mathlib
Adam Topaz (Apr 24 2021 at 14:35):
Ah don't worry about it. I'm writing up some code now.
Adam Topaz (Apr 24 2021 at 14:39):
Hmm... it looks like wide_pullback_shape.lift and wide_pullback_shape.map are missing?
Bhavik Mehta (Apr 24 2021 at 14:40):
I wouldn't be surprised! The wide_pullback API is very minimal
Bhavik Mehta (Apr 24 2021 at 14:41):
The closest thing I could find in the topos project is here but I agree we're probably better off just starting this from scratch
Adam Topaz (Apr 24 2021 at 14:42):
Oh, actually what I mean by wide_pullback_shape.lift is docs#category_theory.limits.wide_pullback_shape.wide_cospan
Adam Topaz (Apr 24 2021 at 14:43):
Bah what namespace is this!? :expressionless:
Bhavik Mehta (Apr 24 2021 at 14:44):
#where :)
Last updated: May 02 2025 at 03:31 UTC