Zulip Chat Archive

Stream: Is there code for X?

Topic: Product in `over X` vs fibered product


Adam Topaz (Apr 24 2021 at 13:47):

If X : C with C a category, do we have any way of relating the product of two (or more) objects in over X to the fibered product (over X) in C? @Scott Morrison @Bhavik Mehta

Bhavik Mehta (Apr 24 2021 at 14:33):

There's some stuff in constructions/over for this!

Bhavik Mehta (Apr 24 2021 at 14:33):

But I made that to show products in over X exist given the fibered products exist - it might not be the most convenient for relating between the two

Adam Topaz (Apr 24 2021 at 14:34):

Gotcha.

Bhavik Mehta (Apr 24 2021 at 14:35):

For the latter, I think there's something helpful buried deep in the topos project which I can try to dig up, but there ought to be something like this in mathlib

Adam Topaz (Apr 24 2021 at 14:35):

Ah don't worry about it. I'm writing up some code now.

Adam Topaz (Apr 24 2021 at 14:39):

Hmm... it looks like wide_pullback_shape.lift and wide_pullback_shape.map are missing?

Bhavik Mehta (Apr 24 2021 at 14:40):

I wouldn't be surprised! The wide_pullback API is very minimal

Bhavik Mehta (Apr 24 2021 at 14:41):

The closest thing I could find in the topos project is here but I agree we're probably better off just starting this from scratch

Adam Topaz (Apr 24 2021 at 14:42):

Oh, actually what I mean by wide_pullback_shape.lift is docs#category_theory.limits.wide_pullback_shape.wide_cospan

Adam Topaz (Apr 24 2021 at 14:43):

Bah what namespace is this!? :expressionless:

Bhavik Mehta (Apr 24 2021 at 14:44):

#where :)


Last updated: Dec 20 2023 at 11:08 UTC