Zulip Chat Archive

Stream: Is there code for X?

Topic: Whitney Extension Theorem (even in 1-d)


Matthew Cushman (Nov 26 2025 at 20:58):

Does there exist any formalization of the Whitney Extension theorem? I'm mainly looking for the simplest 1-d case: given a smooth function on the non-negative reals (smooth on positive, with one-sided derivatives of all orders and those derivatives have limits at 0), it can be extended to a smooth function on all of R.

Michael Rothgang (Nov 26 2025 at 21:31):

CC @Yury G. Kudryashov in case you also thought about this. (I know you formalised "baby Whitney embedding", and that the full version requires Sard's theorem.)

Michael Rothgang (Nov 26 2025 at 21:35):

Searching zulip turns up almost nothing: this was discussed, but AFAICT nobody ever worked on this.

Michael Rothgang (Nov 26 2025 at 21:35):

It would be nice to have. (If the proof is not much harder in n-dimenions, going straight for that would be nice.)

Yury G. Kudryashov (Dec 02 2025 at 00:33):

This question is about Whitney extension thm, not Whitney embedding thm.

Yury G. Kudryashov (Dec 02 2025 at 00:34):

For dimension one, I think that we should add (if we don't have it yet) a theorem saying that you can achieve any Taylor series you want.

Matthew Cushman (Dec 02 2025 at 01:03):

Makes sense, this is what I am thinking of doing as well (afaict it’s not in mathlib yet)

Yury G. Kudryashov (Dec 02 2025 at 01:45):

AFAIR, @Terence Tao recently mentioned Whitney Extension Theorem in another thread. What's the current set of best theorems in this direction? How long are the proofs?


Last updated: Dec 20 2025 at 21:32 UTC