Zulip Chat Archive
Stream: Is there code for X?
Topic: a lemma about inducing?
Scott Morrison (Jul 27 2020 at 13:28):
import topology.continuous_on
lemma inducing.foo {X Y Z : Type*} [topological_space X] [topological_space Y] [topological_space Z]
{f : X → Y} {g : Y → Z} (hf : inducing f) {x : X} (h : continuous_at (g ∘ f) x) :
continuous_at g (f x) :=
sorry
Reid Barton (Jul 27 2020 at 13:33):
I guess it must be basically inducing.tendsto_nhds_iff
Johan Commelin (Jul 27 2020 at 13:38):
That works on the wrong side of the composition...
Johan Commelin (Jul 27 2020 at 13:38):
Maybe the lemma is not even true?
Johan Commelin (Jul 27 2020 at 13:38):
We might need open_embedding f
?
Reid Barton (Jul 27 2020 at 13:39):
Oh whoops, you're right
Reid Barton (Jul 27 2020 at 13:39):
X
could be empty
Reid Barton (Jul 27 2020 at 13:39):
Scott probably confused by >>
order :upside_down:
Johan Commelin (Jul 27 2020 at 13:40):
There is an x : X
in the statement...
Reid Barton (Jul 27 2020 at 13:40):
okay, not empty but a point
Scott Morrison (Jul 27 2020 at 13:40):
no, we were just be over-optimistic :-) in our setting we already know open_embedding f
.
Scott Morrison (Jul 27 2020 at 13:40):
So here's the new target:
lemma open_embedding.foo {X Y Z : Type*} [topological_space X] [topological_space Y] [topological_space Z]
{f : X → Y} {g : Y → Z} (hf : open_embedding f) {x : X} (h : continuous_at (g ∘ f) x) :
continuous_at g (f x) :=
begin
end
Johan Commelin (Jul 27 2020 at 13:40):
/me was over-optimistic...
Reid Barton (Jul 27 2020 at 13:44):
is continuous_at_iff_continuous_at_comp_right
useful?
Reid Barton (Jul 27 2020 at 13:44):
/me has never used continuous_at
Scott Morrison (Jul 27 2020 at 13:51):
That did it, thanks!
Last updated: Dec 20 2023 at 11:08 UTC