Zulip Chat Archive
Stream: Is there code for X?
Topic: localization of exact sequence
Yongle Hu (Sep 22 2024 at 07:55):
Let A
be a communitive ring, M → N → T
be a chain complex of A
-modules.
Is there a formalization of "M → N → T
is exact if and only if Mₘ → Nₘ → Tₘ
is exact for all maximal ideal m
of A
" in Mathlib now?
I have searched for Mathlib.RingTheory.LocalProperties
, but I only found the proof that "the map R → S
is surjective if and only if Rₘ → Sₘ
is surjective."
Yongle Hu (Sep 22 2024 at 08:51):
I have found a proof in one direction, specifically in IsLocalizedModule.map_exact
, but I still haven't found a proof in the other direction.
Christian Merten (Sep 22 2024 at 08:53):
I don't think we have it, but docs#LinearMap.toKerLocalized_isLocalizedModule might help.
Christian Merten (Sep 22 2024 at 08:58):
And I thought we had things about M = 0
being local.
Christian Merten (Sep 22 2024 at 09:12):
Christian Merten said:
I don't think we have it, but docs#LinearMap.toKerLocalized_isLocalizedModule might help.
You might want to write an analog of docs#LinearMap.localized'_ker_eq_ker_localizedMap for docs#LinearMap.range and then show that equality of submodules (in the sense of docs#Submodule.localized') can be checked at maximal ideals.
Yongle Hu (Sep 22 2024 at 10:17):
Christian Merten said:
And I thought we had things about
M = 0
being local.
Do you mean M = 0
if Mₘ = 0
for all maximal ideals m
of A
? I couldn't find this theorem either.
Christian Merten (Sep 22 2024 at 10:29):
Yes, but I can't find it either.
Yongle Hu (Sep 22 2024 at 11:47):
Christian Merten said:
Yes, but I can't find it either.
OK. I think I will prove it first.
Last updated: May 02 2025 at 03:31 UTC