Zulip Chat Archive
Stream: Is there code for X?
Topic: norm of units
Eric Wieser (May 20 2023 at 10:27):
Under what assumptions (other than normed_field
) is the following true?
example {R} [normed_ring R] (u : Rˣ) : ‖(↑u⁻¹ : R)‖ = ‖(u : R)‖⁻¹ := sorry
I can prove one direction, but get stuck at showing ‖↑u‖ * ‖↑u⁻¹‖ ≤ 1
Reid Barton (May 20 2023 at 10:46):
Usually it won't be true, e.g. in a ring of functions, or just a product of normed fields
Eric Wieser (May 20 2023 at 10:50):
I'll remember to try those examples first next time, thanks! It sounds like I #xy'd this incorrectly and don't need the result anyway.
Kevin Buzzard (May 20 2023 at 10:55):
The way to think about it is geometrically. Imagine that R is the functions on a space, and is the supremum of the sizes of the values that the function takes. If takes two values and with , then but so their product is . Reid's example of a product of (say ) normed fields is where the space is finite of size .
Fields are like functions on one point, so the above argument doesn't work for them.
Last updated: Dec 20 2023 at 11:08 UTC