Zulip Chat Archive
Stream: lean4
Topic: Best lim in unicode?
Dean Young (Feb 15 2023 at 22:05):
lim with an arrow under it is common throughout analysis and category theory as well.
I can't seem to find one in the unicode catalogue but maybe those combining characters like combining underscore and combining right arrow could make one: l + combining _ + i + combining _ + m + combining ->.
I'm trying to find the right combining characters as I write this.
Bonus if someone can get the arrow the other way.
Jireh Loreaux (Feb 15 2023 at 22:13):
li͢m
Jireh Loreaux (Feb 15 2023 at 22:16):
I think there is not a ←
version though. This is U+0362 "Combining double rightwards arrow below"
Dean Young (Feb 16 2023 at 19:55):
I also made this:
l͟i͟m͟
if someone can find a > that goes under just nice it might work. I couldn't find one though.
Dean Young (Feb 16 2023 at 19:55):
Using U+0332 (combining low line)
U+20D7 (combining right arrow)
U+0362 (combining double rightwards arrow below)
U+035F
Dean Young (Feb 16 2023 at 19:59):
li͢m
Dean Young (Feb 16 2023 at 20:00):
l͟i͢m
Dean Young (Feb 16 2023 at 20:00):
those ones kinda suck.
Eric Wieser (Feb 16 2023 at 20:01):
I would claim that you don't actually want to use notation like this, because font and editor support for combining monospace characters is really bad
Dean Young (Feb 16 2023 at 20:01):
oh huh ... could come out completely different on a different platform.
Eric Wieser (Feb 16 2023 at 20:02):
If you want something pretty out of your lean code, you could define a ToLatex : Expr -> String
function of some kind
Dean Young (Feb 16 2023 at 20:02):
Oh that seems fun.
Eric Wieser (Feb 16 2023 at 20:07):
I'm pretty certain that other people will have tried it, but I haven't seen anyone announce anything. I think it would be a good exercise to build something like that for basic algebra. Once you have that, sharing it might encourage people to share what they tried
Reid Barton (Feb 16 2023 at 20:08):
You could also sidestep the issue by writing "colim".
Kyle Miller (Feb 16 2023 at 20:30):
@Eric Wieser Here's a screenshot of something that's in the works (part of what Patrick talked about at IPAM), and it contains a LaTeX pretty printer for Expr
:
(Nothing about finsets has really been refined yet. I just happened to be looking at how it handled Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Basic
.)
Eric Wieser (Feb 16 2023 at 20:50):
Yes, I just watched that talk; very cool!
Last updated: Dec 20 2023 at 11:08 UTC