Zulip Chat Archive
Stream: mathlib4
Topic: !4#5074 FieldTheory.IsAlgClosed.AlgebraicClosure
Riccardo Brasca (Jun 16 2023 at 13:50):
The next big boss seems to be !4#5074 (at least it is short...). In particular I am stuck with Step.isIntegral
, that timeouts. I have an horribly slow proof, that works with set_option maxHeartbeats 5000000 in
.
I think that one of the culprit is the use of RingHom.toAlgebra
, but I am not sure.
Riccardo Brasca (Jun 16 2023 at 13:54):
I am currently looking for a slightly different proof
Sebastien Gouezel (Jun 16 2023 at 13:56):
Not directly related to the PR, but I can see that AlgebraicClosure
is not marked as irreducible, which means that the gory details of the construction are available to the kernel whenever one uses it. Wouldn't it make sense to make it irreducible?
Chris Hughes (Jun 16 2023 at 14:36):
There are various smul
diamonds that only commute for SplittingField
and TensorProduct
if they are not irreducible I believe. The same may be true of algebraic closure, although I believe it wasn't constructed with as much care so they might not commute anyway.
Riccardo Brasca (Jun 16 2023 at 14:37):
I am wondering if we should change the definition, following what you did with SplittingField
.
Chris Hughes (Jun 16 2023 at 14:40):
https://leanprover.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/287929-mathlib4/topic/Nontrivial.20typeclass.20def-eqs is an example for TensorProduct
Chris Hughes (Jun 16 2023 at 14:43):
Riccardo Brasca said:
I am wondering if we should change the definition, following what you did with
SplittingField
.
I think the definition AdjoinMonic
in the current file is the algebraic closure and satisfies the nice def-eqs because it is a quotient of MvPolynomial
. Kenny couldn't be bothered to prove this was algebraically closed and carried on adding all the roots and taking some direct limit to make a field that was easier to prove was algebraically closed, but I think proving AdjoinMonic
is algebraically closed is the best construction.
Riccardo Brasca (Jun 16 2023 at 15:00):
I don't mean to change the mathematical construction, but the way it is written in Lean. Currently, the real this is AdjoinMonic
, used to define stepAux
. Then no instance are added to stepAux
, but we define Step = stepAux.1
and we add the various instance.
Now, the prof that Step k n
is algebraic is essentially an induction on n
, as follows: the case n=0
is easy, and we split the n+1
case via the tower k → Step k n → Step k (n+1)
. The first morphism is algebraic by induction hypothesis and the second because of the properties of AdjoinMonic
. The problem is that Lean has troubles in understanding that the second morphism is the one given by AdjoinMonic
Riccardo Brasca (Jun 16 2023 at 15:02):
I tried to unfold manually Step
, and things seem to be faster, but then all the instances (for example Algebra k
stepAux``) are missing
Riccardo Brasca (Jun 16 2023 at 15:03):
But I am done for today :(
Riccardo Brasca (Jun 16 2023 at 15:08):
I've pushed the proof I have, with two sorry
that makes it working without increasing the hearbeats. I tried to use RingHom.IsIntegral
to have more control on the algebra instances.
Nikolas Kuhn (Jun 18 2023 at 18:40):
I got a somewhat faster version (only 700000 Heartbeats) by separating out some things. I'll push it for now - everything compiles, but some proofs are still slow (max. is 900 k further down in the file).
Nikolas Kuhn (Jun 18 2023 at 18:45):
I'll open it up for review, but please take another look whether you like it @Riccardo Brasca !
Riccardo Brasca (Jun 18 2023 at 20:36):
I will have a look tomorrow, thanks!
Last updated: Dec 20 2023 at 11:08 UTC