Zulip Chat Archive
Stream: mathlib4
Topic: Infer kinds are unsupported
Moritz Doll (Dec 13 2022 at 12:49):
What should I do about this error from mathport?
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Command.lean:379:30: infer kinds are unsupported in Lean 4: #[`abv_nonneg] [] -/
Ruben Van de Velde (Dec 13 2022 at 12:50):
Never seen that. Does it break anything?
Moritz Doll (Dec 13 2022 at 12:51):
nope
Moritz Doll (Dec 13 2022 at 12:51):
(except for the 100 char linter)
Ruben Van de Velde (Dec 13 2022 at 12:52):
Maybe it's about the []
in the mathlib3 declaration? I never understood what those were for either :)
Eric Rodriguez (Dec 13 2022 at 16:39):
So it's about setting some things to implicits, I don't know how to describe it but the answer is kinda "look at docs#countable vs docs4#Countable and the next few lines"
Eric Rodriguez (Dec 13 2022 at 16:40):
This has bit me before and should be written in the wiki, I would do it but I'm a bit under the weather
Mario Carneiro (Dec 13 2022 at 17:06):
the effect of the []
in src#is_absolute_value.abv_nonneg is to make the f
argument explicit. Lean 4 does not support this annotation, so if you take the definition that mathport gives you then f
will be implicit.
Mario Carneiro (Dec 13 2022 at 17:07):
I don't think there is any principled reason for the removal in lean 4, except for an optimistic hope that it is a rarely used feature with a weird syntax and we can get by without it
Jireh Loreaux (Jan 24 2023 at 20:13):
What about when the structure field is data (e.g., docs#bornology.cobounded)? If I follow the method in docs4#Countable, I would have a structure field Bornology.cobounded'
where the α
is implicit and a def following it Bornology.cobounded
with α
explicit. Surely we don't want both floating around though. So how do I handle this?
Last updated: Dec 20 2023 at 11:08 UTC