Zulip Chat Archive
Stream: mathlib4
Topic: weird `toAdditive` name
Sébastien Gouëzel (May 18 2025 at 19:29):
The additivization of docs#ContinuousMul.measurableMul is, as you may expect, docs#ContinuousAdd.measurableAdd. The additivization of docs#ContinuousMul.measurableMul₂ is, more surprisingly, docs#ContinuousAdd.measurableMul₂. I could tweak it by hand to give it the right name, but I'd rather understand what is going on here in a more principled way...
Michael Rothgang (May 18 2025 at 19:30):
CC @Floris van Doorn
Yaël Dillies (May 18 2025 at 19:32):
You need to add an entry to docs#ToAdditive.nameDict
Sébastien Gouëzel (May 18 2025 at 19:42):
An entry like what? Mul is normally additivized to Add. The problem is the suffix ₂ here. Adding an entry for each suffix doesn't look like an optimal strategy...
Michael Rothgang (May 19 2025 at 07:08):
Should to_additive be modified to split off superscript suffixes, try to additivise the name and rejoin them?
Yaël Dillies (May 19 2025 at 07:14):
Sébastien Gouëzel said:
Adding an entry for each suffix doesn't look like an optimal strategy...
There are only 10 digit and 17 letter subscripts after all... :grinning:
Jz Pan (May 19 2025 at 10:45):
Yaël Dillies said:
Sébastien Gouëzel said:
Adding an entry for each suffix doesn't look like an optimal strategy...
There are only 10 digit and 17 letter subscripts after all... :grinning:
But digits can be combined for numbers
Damiano Testa (May 19 2025 at 10:47):
Or maybe nameDict should be taught to split names at sub/super scripts.
Floris van Doorn (May 19 2025 at 13:33):
As others have said, the easiest is indeed to teach docs#String.splitCase that all subscript/superscript characters are separators between word parts. Currently we only consider _ as a separator, but I think it's fine to also separate on all subscript digits (or all sub/superscript letters/digits - changing ᵐᵘˡ to ᵃᵈᵈ can be outside the scope of to_additive).
Last updated: Dec 20 2025 at 21:32 UTC