Zulip Chat Archive

Stream: FLT-regular

Topic: docstrings


Kevin Buzzard (Nov 09 2021 at 13:23):

Could someone PR a module docstring for algebra.norm_eq_prod_embeddings? It's just hit mathlib. I want to use this theorem as an example of something on my blog and it would be good if someone added a nice docstring so I could point blog readers to the community API entry and it would look less intimidating than it does now.

Kevin Buzzard (Nov 09 2021 at 13:33):

How about

for L/K a finite separable extension of fields and E an algebraically closed extension of K, the norm (down to K) of an element x of L is equal to the product of the images of x over all the K-embeddings $latex \sigma$ of L into E.

am on mobile right now going to Cambridge :D

Chris Birkbeck (Nov 09 2021 at 13:40):

Sure I can try and do it .

Eric Rodriguez (Nov 09 2021 at 14:03):

#10242, for those following along here!

Chris Birkbeck (Nov 09 2021 at 14:04):

Ah yes, thank you!

Riccardo Brasca (Nov 09 2021 at 14:28):

Thanks! I wanted to do it before PRing it but I forgot

Riccardo Brasca (Nov 09 2021 at 17:13):

@Kevin Buzzard Depending on what you want to talk about, you may want to mention that in docs#algebra.norm_eq_prod_embeddings the assumption is_scalar_tower K L E is not needed, and I realized this just because the linter told me so. (Here L/KL/K is the fields extension we are talking about, and mathematically we take an algebraically closed extension of LL, that of course is also an algebraically closed extension of KK.)

Riccardo Brasca (Nov 09 2021 at 17:25):

I just realized that E is not even an L-algebra :sweat_smile:

Kevin Buzzard (Nov 10 2021 at 00:04):

Yes, everything is consistent

Kevin Buzzard (Nov 09 2021 at 13:23):

Could someone PR a module docstring for algebra.norm_eq_prod_embeddings? It's just hit mathlib. I want to use this theorem as an example of something on my blog and it would be good if someone added a nice docstring so I could point blog readers to the community API entry and it would look less intimidating than it does now.

Kevin Buzzard (Nov 09 2021 at 13:33):

How about

for L/K a finite separable extension of fields and E an algebraically closed extension of K, the norm (down to K) of an element x of L is equal to the product of the images of x over all the K-embeddings $latex \sigma$ of L into E.

am on mobile right now going to Cambridge :D

Chris Birkbeck (Nov 09 2021 at 13:40):

Sure I can try and do it .

Eric Rodriguez (Nov 09 2021 at 14:03):

#10242, for those following along here!

Chris Birkbeck (Nov 09 2021 at 14:04):

Ah yes, thank you!

Riccardo Brasca (Nov 09 2021 at 14:28):

Thanks! I wanted to do it before PRing it but I forgot

Riccardo Brasca (Nov 09 2021 at 17:13):

@Kevin Buzzard Depending on what you want to talk about, you may want to mention that in docs#algebra.norm_eq_prod_embeddings the assumption is_scalar_tower K L E is not needed, and I realized this just because the linter told me so. (Here L/KL/K is the fields extension we are talking about, and mathematically we take an algebraically closed extension of LL, that of course is also an algebraically closed extension of KK.)

Riccardo Brasca (Nov 09 2021 at 17:25):

I just realized that E is not even an L-algebra :sweat_smile:

Kevin Buzzard (Nov 10 2021 at 00:04):

Yes, everything is consistent


Last updated: Dec 20 2023 at 11:08 UTC