Zulip Chat Archive
Stream: FLT-regular
Topic: docstrings
Kevin Buzzard (Nov 09 2021 at 13:23):
Could someone PR a module docstring for algebra.norm_eq_prod_embeddings
? It's just hit mathlib. I want to use this theorem as an example of something on my blog and it would be good if someone added a nice docstring so I could point blog readers to the community API entry and it would look less intimidating than it does now.
Kevin Buzzard (Nov 09 2021 at 13:33):
How about
for L/K a finite separable extension of fields and E an algebraically closed extension of K, the norm (down to K) of an element x of L is equal to the product of the images of x over all the K-embeddings $latex \sigma$ of L into E.
am on mobile right now going to Cambridge :D
Chris Birkbeck (Nov 09 2021 at 13:40):
Sure I can try and do it .
Eric Rodriguez (Nov 09 2021 at 14:03):
#10242, for those following along here!
Chris Birkbeck (Nov 09 2021 at 14:04):
Ah yes, thank you!
Riccardo Brasca (Nov 09 2021 at 14:28):
Thanks! I wanted to do it before PRing it but I forgot
Riccardo Brasca (Nov 09 2021 at 17:13):
@Kevin Buzzard Depending on what you want to talk about, you may want to mention that in docs#algebra.norm_eq_prod_embeddings the assumption is_scalar_tower K L E
is not needed, and I realized this just because the linter told me so. (Here is the fields extension we are talking about, and mathematically we take an algebraically closed extension of , that of course is also an algebraically closed extension of .)
Riccardo Brasca (Nov 09 2021 at 17:25):
I just realized that E
is not even an L
-algebra :sweat_smile:
Kevin Buzzard (Nov 10 2021 at 00:04):
Yes, everything is consistent
Kevin Buzzard (Nov 09 2021 at 13:23):
Could someone PR a module docstring for algebra.norm_eq_prod_embeddings
? It's just hit mathlib. I want to use this theorem as an example of something on my blog and it would be good if someone added a nice docstring so I could point blog readers to the community API entry and it would look less intimidating than it does now.
Kevin Buzzard (Nov 09 2021 at 13:33):
How about
for L/K a finite separable extension of fields and E an algebraically closed extension of K, the norm (down to K) of an element x of L is equal to the product of the images of x over all the K-embeddings $latex \sigma$ of L into E.
am on mobile right now going to Cambridge :D
Chris Birkbeck (Nov 09 2021 at 13:40):
Sure I can try and do it .
Eric Rodriguez (Nov 09 2021 at 14:03):
#10242, for those following along here!
Chris Birkbeck (Nov 09 2021 at 14:04):
Ah yes, thank you!
Riccardo Brasca (Nov 09 2021 at 14:28):
Thanks! I wanted to do it before PRing it but I forgot
Riccardo Brasca (Nov 09 2021 at 17:13):
@Kevin Buzzard Depending on what you want to talk about, you may want to mention that in docs#algebra.norm_eq_prod_embeddings the assumption is_scalar_tower K L E
is not needed, and I realized this just because the linter told me so. (Here is the fields extension we are talking about, and mathematically we take an algebraically closed extension of , that of course is also an algebraically closed extension of .)
Riccardo Brasca (Nov 09 2021 at 17:25):
I just realized that E
is not even an L
-algebra :sweat_smile:
Kevin Buzzard (Nov 10 2021 at 00:04):
Yes, everything is consistent
Last updated: Dec 20 2023 at 11:08 UTC