Zulip Chat Archive
Stream: Carleson
Topic: nitpick in 4.1.3
Edward van de Meent (Jun 26 2024 at 13:40):
in the proof of the first inclusion of statement 4.1.15, one step of the proof is showing that from and using the triangle inequality and the fact that ... am i missing something or is that not correct?
Edward van de Meent (Jun 26 2024 at 13:41):
because from what i can tell, that only allows you to show that ...
Floris van Doorn (Jun 26 2024 at 13:47):
Note that and so . Does that solve the issue?
Floris van Doorn (Jun 26 2024 at 13:48):
In this case it seems like you need .
Edward van de Meent (Jun 26 2024 at 13:48):
yea, i think that should do it...
Edward van de Meent (Jun 26 2024 at 13:49):
i'll add it as a lemma in defs
, if that's alright...
Floris van Doorn (Jun 26 2024 at 13:51):
Yes, please add lower bounds for D
that we actually use as a lemmas. Once the formalization is done (or we are much further), I'm interested in lowering certain bounds, and therefore it is convenient to use the specific value of the constants as little as possible, and instead use lemmas with bounds.
Floris van Doorn (Jun 26 2024 at 13:57):
Please also fix the 4
s in the blueprint to the actual value you need.
Last updated: May 02 2025 at 03:31 UTC