Zulip Chat Archive

Stream: PhysLean

Topic: Social Media


Joseph Tooby-Smith (Jun 16 2025 at 09:34):

So I often post about PhysLean on my own personal social media accounts (usually LinkedIn - which is the only one I really have), but last week I created a bluesky account for news related to the project:

:link: https://bsky.app/profile/physlean.bsky.social

The idea is to post about things happening in the project, and anything else related, with the aim to increase visibility amongst physicists.

If anyone has ideas for posts or anything else related to this, or wants to help run the account, this is a thread for that :).

Alok Singh (Jun 20 2025 at 17:18):

Twitter =)?

Joseph Tooby-Smith (Jun 20 2025 at 19:12):

Made a twitter account a few days ago - although haven't put so much effort into this yet: https://x.com/PhysLean

Joseph Tooby-Smith (Jul 31 2025 at 06:39):

New mastodon account: https://mathstodon.xyz/@PhysLean

Afiq Hatta (Aug 04 2025 at 08:52):

fwiw i have a plan to casually blog about my first commits to physlean on my blog + some motivating statements - the substack got around 10k views a month so hopefully would give physlean some visibility. https://chillphysicsenjoyer.substack.com/

Joseph Tooby-Smith (Aug 04 2025 at 09:05):

Nice! This would be very much appreciated :slight_smile: .

Afiq Hatta (Aug 27 2025 at 08:54):

i am surprised to the upside about the reception of this post

#PhysLean

its got 18 substack likes, which is a lot in the substack world!

Afiq Hatta (Aug 27 2025 at 08:54):

https://chillphysicsenjoyer.substack.com/p/we-should-formalise-physics

Joseph Tooby-Smith (Aug 27 2025 at 09:33):

Awesome! Thanks for writing this @Afiq Hatta and helping spread the word :).

Afiq Hatta (Sep 10 2025 at 10:42):

https://chillphysicsenjoyer.substack.com/p/try-to-prove-math-with-computers

Afiq Hatta (Sep 10 2025 at 10:42):

a more walkthroughy post for noobs like me ;)

Kevin Buzzard (Sep 10 2025 at 10:54):

I am slightly concerned that people will read this post and come away with the feeling that proving 0 <= 2 in Lean is somewhat of a complicated adventure, when in fact it is just closed immediately with the mathlib tactic norm_num, something which is never mentioned in that post.

Kevin Buzzard (Sep 10 2025 at 10:55):

Put another way, someone reading that post might think "wow, so presumably proving 1 <= 5 is basically impossible in Lean because it was so much work to prove 0 <= 2". Might I suggest that you mention at the end that

import Mathlib.Tactic

example : 37  1000000 := by
  norm_num

works fine?

Afiq Hatta (Sep 10 2025 at 10:56):

good point @Kevin Buzzard - it was meant to be a pretty contrived example. I think what I'll do is put a healthy disclaimer in the beginning that there are standard libraries out there!

Afiq Hatta (Sep 10 2025 at 10:57):

really grateful for the feedback. i'll also put that piece of code at the bottom

Afiq Hatta (Sep 10 2025 at 11:02):

@Kevin Buzzard updated the post


Last updated: Dec 20 2025 at 21:32 UTC