Zulip Chat Archive

Stream: combinatorial-games

Topic: Misère play


Violeta Hernández (Jul 26 2025 at 19:48):

@Tomasz Maciosowski Hi! We have our own channel now.

Violeta Hernández (Jul 26 2025 at 19:53):

I've kept thinking about how to implement this in Lean. I do think my idea of using toMisere is useful if as nothing else than an auxiliary definition. It gives us all of this outcome machinery basically for free, and in particular it allows us to state very simple definitions of MisereEQ and MisereLE.

Violeta Hernández (Jul 26 2025 at 20:03):

I'd pretty interested in the triviality theorem you mention, x =m Any game 0 <-> x = 0. I imagine this generalizes to x =m AnyGame y <-> x = y. Is there a proof of that somewhere?

Tomasz Maciosowski (Jul 27 2025 at 14:32):

Hi! Sorry I'll be a bit slow cause I have a bit on my mind for the next week but I'll be looking into this for sure. I'd like to spend some time playing with your definition to see how easy I can translate some of the proofs

Tomasz Maciosowski (Jul 27 2025 at 14:34):

Violeta Hernández said:

I'd pretty interested in the triviality theorem you mention, x =m Any game 0 <-> x = 0. I imagine this generalizes to x =m AnyGame y <-> x = y. Is there a proof of that somewhere?

That doesn't hold iirc they're still equivalence classes but much smaller. Let me look for some reference

Tomasz Maciosowski (Jul 27 2025 at 14:43):

Misère canonical forms of partizan games [p. 9] is a good one I think, the bound on number of misere games born by day 3 is under 25122^{512} so there are some different game forms that are equal in misere

Tomasz Maciosowski (Jul 28 2025 at 22:12):

Just randomly bumped into it, Simplification of Partizan Games in Misère Play has actual example
Screenshot_20250729_001142.png

Violeta Hernández (Jul 29 2025 at 00:17):

Ooh, that'd be good for the counterexample folder!

Violeta Hernández (Jul 29 2025 at 00:37):

Tomasz Maciosowski said:

Hi! Sorry I'll be a bit slow cause I have a bit on my mind for the next week but I'll be looking into this for sure. I'd like to spend some time playing with your definition to see how easy I can translate some of the proofs

If you don't mind, I could try adapting your PR myself.

Violeta Hernández (Jul 29 2025 at 00:37):

(deleted)

Tomasz Maciosowski (Jul 29 2025 at 18:21):

Sure, go ahead! I'll have way more time next week to play with lean


Last updated: Dec 20 2025 at 21:32 UTC