Monic does not necessarily imply IsRegular in a Semiring with no opposites #
This counterexample shows that the hypothesis Ring R cannot be changed to Semiring R in
Polynomial.Monic.isRegular.
The example is very simple.
The coefficient Semiring is the Semiring N₃ of the natural numbers {0, 1, 2, 3} where the
standard addition and standard multiplication are truncated at 3.
The products (X + 2) * (X + 2) and (X + 2) * (X + 3) are equal to
X ^ 2 + 4 * X + 4 and X ^ 2 + 5 * X + 6 respectively.
By truncation, 4, 5, 6 all mean 3 in N.
It follows that multiplication by (X + 2) is not injective.
N₃ is going to be a CommSemiring where addition and multiplication are truncated at 3.
Instances For
Equations
Equations
Truncated addition on N₃.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Truncated multiplication on N₃.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
The main example: multiplication by the polynomial X + 2 is not injective,
yet the polynomial is monic.
The statement of the counterexample: not all monic polynomials over semirings are regular.