Zulip Chat Archive
Stream: Is there code for X?
Topic: Roughly, Lipschitzness of the inverse of `exp (t * I)`
Geoffrey Irving (Feb 18 2024 at 14:25):
Do we have this, or something which can easily get to it:
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Basic
open Complex (abs exp I)
open scoped Real
lemma lipschitz_inv_exp_mul_I {t : ℝ} (m : t ∈ Set.Ioc (-π) π) :
|t| ≤ π / 2 * abs (exp (t * I) - 1) := by
sorry
Geoffrey Irving (Feb 18 2024 at 14:28):
It's equivalent to t^2 ≤ π^2/2 * (1 - cos t)
.
Yaël Dillies (Feb 18 2024 at 14:34):
I just proved this in a PR
Yaël Dillies (Feb 18 2024 at 14:35):
I needed to show the arc-distance and chord distance on the circle are equivalent
Geoffrey Irving (Feb 18 2024 at 14:35):
Yes, that’s also why I need it.
Geoffrey Irving (Feb 18 2024 at 14:35):
Which PR?
Yaël Dillies (Feb 18 2024 at 14:35):
Geoffrey Irving (Feb 18 2024 at 14:37):
Thanks! I will steal it for now with comments to strip it once it’s in.
Geoffrey Irving (Feb 18 2024 at 14:40):
Actually might just leave mine as sorry, as it’ll probably be in before I finish the rest of Koebe.
Yaël Dillies (Feb 18 2024 at 14:41):
(best way to make sure it's in is to review it :pray:)
Geoffrey Irving (Feb 18 2024 at 14:44):
Happy to! Anything I need to do prior to that, or should I just do it now? (Might end up as this evening.)
Yaël Dillies (Feb 18 2024 at 14:56):
Nothing to do prior to that. Anybody can review anything anytime
Eric Wieser (Feb 18 2024 at 14:58):
There is a review guide at https://leanprover-community.github.io/contribute/pr-review.html, which has lots of Lean-specific advice even if you're no stranger to code review.
Geoffrey Irving (Feb 18 2024 at 15:08):
Great, will read through that and review this evening.
Geoffrey Irving (Feb 18 2024 at 15:09):
Though there are already several reviewers? Not sure what the norms are in such situations.
Jireh Loreaux (Feb 18 2024 at 15:11):
You're always welcome to add your review, regardless of who else has reviewed.
Jireh Loreaux (Feb 18 2024 at 15:12):
Of course, you may want to read through what prior reviews have said so you don't duplicate.
Geoffrey Irving (Feb 18 2024 at 21:42):
"Approved", FWIW. But to check: where is the result I wanted in that PR? Is it elsewhere in the angle theory, and now there's a bridge between the two?
Yaël Dillies (Feb 18 2024 at 22:02):
Whoops sorry I meant #10525, not #10226
Yaël Dillies (Feb 18 2024 at 22:02):
Seems like my clipboard played me
Geoffrey Irving (Feb 18 2024 at 22:03):
I'll review that one too in a moment.
Last updated: May 02 2025 at 03:31 UTC