Shapes of homological complexes #
We define a structure ComplexShape ι
for describing the shapes of homological complexes
indexed by a type ι
.
This is intended to capture chain complexes and cochain complexes, indexed by either ℕ
or ℤ
,
as well as more exotic examples.
Rather than insisting that the indexing type has a succ
function
specifying where differentials should go,
inside c : ComplexShape
we have c.Rel : ι → ι → Prop
,
and when we define HomologicalComplex
we only allow nonzero differentials d i j
from i
to j
if c.Rel i j
.
Further, we require that { j // c.Rel i j }
and { i // c.Rel i j }
are subsingletons.
This means that the shape consists of some union of lines, rays, intervals, and circles.
Convenience functions c.next
and c.prev
provide these related elements
when they exist, and return their input otherwise.
This design aims to avoid certain problems arising from dependent type theory.
In particular we never have to ensure morphisms d i : X i ⟶ X (succ i)
compose as
expected (which would often require rewriting by equations in the indexing type).
Instead such identities become separate proof obligations when verifying that a
complex we've constructed is of the desired shape.
If α
is an AddRightCancelSemigroup
, then we define up α : ComplexShape α
,
the shape appropriate for cohomology, so d : X i ⟶ X j
is nonzero only when j = i + 1
,
as well as down α : ComplexShape α
, appropriate for homology,
so d : X i ⟶ X j
is nonzero only when i = j + 1
.
(Later we'll introduce CochainComplex
and ChainComplex
as abbreviations for
HomologicalComplex
with one of these shapes baked in.)
A c : ComplexShape ι
describes the shape of a chain complex,
with chain groups indexed by ι
.
Typically ι
will be ℕ
, ℤ
, or Fin n
.
There is a relation Rel : ι → ι → Prop
,
and we will only allow a non-zero differential from i
to j
when Rel i j
.
There are axioms which imply { j // c.Rel i j }
and { i // c.Rel i j }
are subsingletons.
This means that the shape consists of some union of lines, rays, intervals, and circles.
Below we define c.next
and c.prev
which provide these related elements.
- Rel : ι → ι → Prop
Nonzero differentials
X i ⟶ X j
shall be allowed on homological complexes whenRel i j
holds. - next_eq {i j j' : ι} : self.Rel i j → self.Rel i j' → j = j'
There is at most one nonzero differential from
X i
. - prev_eq {i i' j : ι} : self.Rel i j → self.Rel i' j → i = i'
There is at most one nonzero differential to
X j
.
Instances For
The complex shape where only differentials from each X.i
to itself are allowed.
This is mostly only useful so we can describe the relation of "related in k
steps" below.
Equations
- ComplexShape.refl ι = { Rel := fun (i j : ι) => i = j, next_eq := ⋯, prev_eq := ⋯ }
Instances For
The reverse of a ComplexShape
.
Equations
- c.symm = { Rel := fun (i j : ι) => c.Rel j i, next_eq := ⋯, prev_eq := ⋯ }
Instances For
The "composition" of two ComplexShape
s.
We need this to define "related in k steps" later.
Equations
- c₁.trans c₂ = { Rel := Relation.Comp c₁.Rel c₂.Rel, next_eq := ⋯, prev_eq := ⋯ }
Instances For
The ComplexShape
allowing differentials from X i
to X (i+a)
.
(For example when a = 1
, a cohomology theory indexed by ℕ
or ℤ
)
Equations
- ComplexShape.up' a = { Rel := fun (i j : α) => i + a = j, next_eq := ⋯, prev_eq := ⋯ }
Instances For
The ComplexShape
allowing differentials from X (j+a)
to X j
.
(For example when a = 1
, a homology theory indexed by ℕ
or ℤ
)
Equations
- ComplexShape.down' a = { Rel := fun (i j : α) => j + a = i, next_eq := ⋯, prev_eq := ⋯ }
Instances For
The ComplexShape
appropriate for cohomology, so d : X i ⟶ X j
only when j = i + 1
.
Equations
Instances For
The ComplexShape
appropriate for homology, so d : X i ⟶ X j
only when i = j + 1
.
Equations
Instances For
Equations
- ComplexShape.instDecidableRelRelUp' α a x✝¹ x✝ = id inferInstance
Equations
- ComplexShape.instDecidableRelRelDown' α a x✝¹ x✝ = id inferInstance
Equations
- ComplexShape.instDecidableRelRelUp α = id inferInstance
Equations
- ComplexShape.instDecidableRelRelDown α = id inferInstance