Krasner's Lemma #
In this file, we prove Krasner's lemma.
Main definitions #
IsKrasner K L: Given a field extensionL / KwhereLis a normed field,IsKrasner K Lis the abstraction of the conclusion of Krasner's lemma. That is,IsKrasner K Lmeans that given two elementsx y : L, such thatxis separable overK, all conjugate roots ofxlive inL,yis integral overK, and the distance betweenxandyis less than the distance betweenxand any other conjugate root ofx, thenxis in the field generated byKandy.
Main results #
IsKrasner.of_complete: IfKis a complete normed field, such that the norm ofLextends the norm onK, thenIsKrasner K Lholds for every algebraic extensionLoverK. This implies the classical Krasner's lemma by takingLas the separable closure ofK.
Reference #
For the classical statement of Krasner's lemma, please see the wikipedia page.
Tags #
Krasner's lemma, normed field
Given a field extension L / K where L is a normed field, IsKrasner K L is the abstraction
of the conclusion of Krasner's lemma. That is, IsKrasner K L means that given two elements
x y : L, such that x is separable over K, all conjugate roots of x live in L,
y is integral over K, and the distance between x and y is less than the distance between
x and any other conjugate root of x, then x is in the field generated by K and y.
- krasner' {x y : L} : IsSeparable K x → (Polynomial.map (algebraMap K L) (minpoly K x)).Splits → IsIntegral K y → (∀ (x' : L), IsConjRoot K x x' → x ≠ x' → ‖x - y‖ < ‖x - x'‖) → x ∈ K⟮y⟯
Instances
If K is a complete nontrivially normed field and L is an algebraic extension of K
such that the norm of L extends the norm on K, then IsKrasner K L holds.
This corresponds to the classical Krasner's lemma.