Adjoint triples #
This file concerns adjoint triples F ⊣ G ⊣ H
of functors F H : C ⥤ D
, G : D ⥤ C
. We first
prove that F
is fully faithful iff H
is, and then prove results about the two special cases
where G
is fully faithful or F
and H
are.
Main results #
All results are about an adjoint triple F ⊣ G ⊣ H
where adj₁ : F ⊣ G
and adj₂ : G ⊣ H
. We
bundle the adjunctions in a structure Triple F G H
.
fullyFaithfulEquiv
:F
is fully faithful iffH
is.rightToLeft
: the canonical natural transformationH ⟶ F
that exists wheneverG
is fully faithful. This is defined as the preimage ofadj₂.counit ≫ adj₁.unit
under whiskering withG
, but formulas in terms of the units resp. counits of the adjunctions are also given.whiskerRight_rightToLeft
: whiskeringrightToLeft : H ⟶ F
withG
yieldsadj₂.counit ≫ adj₁.unit : H ⋙ G ⟶ F ⋙ G
.epi_rightToLeft_app_iff_epi_map_adj₁_unit_app
:rightToLeft : H ⟶ F
is epic atX
iff the image ofadj₁.unit.app X
underH
is.epi_rightToLeft_app_iff_epi_map_adj₂_counit_app
:rightToLeft : H ⟶ F
is epic atX
iff the image ofadj₂.counit.app X
underF
is.epi_rightToLeft_app_iff
: whenH
preserves epimorphisms,rightToLeft : H ⟶ F
is epic atX
iffadj₂.counit ≫ adj₁.unit : H ⋙ G ⟶ F ⋙ G
is.leftToRight
: the canonical natural transformationF ⟶ H
that exists wheneverF
andH
are fully faithful. This is defined in terms of the units of the adjunctions, but a formula in terms of the counits is also given.whiskerLeft_leftToRight
: whiskeringG
withleftToRight : F ⟶ H
yieldsadj₁.counit ≫ adj₂.unit : G ⋙ F ⟶ G ⋙ H
.mono_leftToRight_app_iff_mono_adj₂_unit_app
:leftToRight : F ⟶ H
is monic atX
iffadj₂.unit
is monic atF.obj X
.mono_leftToRight_app_iff_mono_adj₁_counit_app
:leftToRight : F ⟶ H
is monic atX
iffadj₁.unit
is monic atH.obj X
.mono_leftToRight_app_iff
:leftToRight : H ⟶ F
is componentwise monic iffadj₁.counit ≫ adj₂.unit : G ⋙ F ⟶ G ⋙ H
is.
Structure containing the two adjunctions of an adjoint triple F ⊣ G ⊣ H
.
Adjunction
F ⊣ G
of the adjoint tripleF ⊣ G ⊣ H
.Adjunction
G ⊣ H
of the adjoint tripleF ⊣ G ⊣ H
.
Instances For
Given an adjoint triple F ⊣ G ⊣ H
, the left adjoint F
is fully faithful if and only if the
right adjoint H
is fully faithful.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
The natural transformation H ⟶ F
that exists for every adjoint triple F ⊣ G ⊣ H
where G
is fully faithful, given here as the preimage of adj₂.counit ≫ adj₁.unit : H ⋙ G ⟶ F ⋙ G
under whiskering with G
.
Equations
Instances For
For an adjoint triple F ⊣ G ⊣ H
where G
is fully faithful, whiskering the natural
transformation H ⟶ F
with G
yields the composition of the counit of the second adjunction with
the unit of the first adjunction.
For an adjoint triple F ⊣ G ⊣ H
where G
is fully faithful, the images of the components of
the natural transformation H ⟶ F
under G
are the components of the composition of counit of the
second adjunction with the unit of the first adjunction.
The natural transformation H ⟶ F
for an adjoint triple F ⊣ G ⊣ H
with G
fully faithful
is also equal to the whiskered unit H ⟶ F ⋙ G ⋙ H
of the first adjunction followed by the
inverse of the whiskered unit F ⟶ F ⋙ G ⋙ H
of the second.
The natural transformation H ⟶ F
for an adjoint triple F ⊣ G ⊣ H
with G
fully faithful
is also equal to the inverse of the whiskered counit H ⋙ G ⋙ F ⟶ H
of the first adjunction
followed by the whiskered counit H ⋙ G ⋙ F ⟶ F
of the second.
For an adjoint triple F ⊣ G ⊣ H
where G
is fully faithful, the natural transformation
H ⟶ F
is epic at X
iff the image of the unit of the adjunction F ⊣ G
under H
is.
For an adjoint triple F ⊣ G ⊣ H
where G
is fully faithful, the natural transformation
H ⟶ F
is epic at X
iff the image of the counit of the adjunction G ⊣ H
under F
is.
For an adjoint triple F ⊣ G ⊣ H
where G
is fully faithful and H
preserves epimorphisms
(which is for example the case if H
has a further right adjoint), the components of the natural
transformation H ⟶ F
are epic iff the respective components of the natural transformation
H ⋙ G ⟶ F ⋙ G
obtained from the units and counits of the adjunctions are.
The natural transformation F ⟶ H
that exists for every adjoint triple F ⊣ G ⊣ H
where F
and H
are fully faithful, given here as the whiskered unit F ⟶ F ⋙ G ⋙ H
of the second
adjunction followed by the inverse of the whiskered unit F ⋙ G ⋙ H ⟶ H
of the first.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
The natural transformation F ⟶ H
for an adjoint triple F ⊣ G ⊣ H
with F
and H
fully faithful is also equal to the inverse of the whiskered counit H ⋙ G ⋙ F ⟶ F
of the second
adjunction followed by the whiskered counit H ⋙ G ⋙ F ⟶ H
of the first.
For an adjoint triple F ⊣ G ⊣ H
where F
and H
are fully faithful, the components of the
natural transformation F ⟶ H
at G
are precisely the components of the natural transformation
G ⋙ F ⟶ G ⋙ H
obtained from the units and counits of the adjunctions.
For an adjoint triple F ⊣ G ⊣ H
where F
and H
are fully faithful, whiskering G
with the
natural transformation F ⟶ H
yields the composition of the counit of the first adjunction with
the unit of the second adjunction.
For an adjoint triple F ⊣ G ⊣ H
where F
and H
are fully faithful, the natural
transformation F ⟶ H
is monic at X
iff the unit of the adjunction G ⊣ H
is monic
at F.obj X
.
For an adjoint triple F ⊣ G ⊣ H
where F
and H
are fully faithful, the natural
transformation F ⟶ H
is monic at X
iff the counit of the adjunction F ⊣ G
is monic
at H.obj X
.
For an adjoint triple F ⊣ G ⊣ H
where F
and H
are fully faithful, the natural
transformation F ⟶ H
is componentwise monic iff the natural transformation G ⋙ F ⟶ G ⋙ H
obtained from the units and counits of the adjunctions is.
Note that unlike epi_rightToLeft_app_iff
, this equivalence does not make sense
on a per-object basis because the components of the two natural transformations are indexed by
different categories.