Documentation

Mathlib.SetTheory.Game.Impartial

Basic definitions about impartial (pre-)games #

We will define an impartial game, one in which left and right can make exactly the same moves. Our definition differs slightly by saying that the game is always equivalent to its negative, no matter what moves are played. This allows for games such as poker-nim to be classified as impartial.

source
@[irreducible]
def SetTheory.PGame.ImpartialAux (G : SetTheory.PGame) :
Prop

The definition for an impartial game, defined using Conway induction.

Equations
  • G.ImpartialAux = (G ≈ -G ∧ (∀ (i : G.LeftMoves), (G.moveLeft i).ImpartialAux) ∧ ∀ (j : G.RightMoves), (G.moveRight j).ImpartialAux)
Instances For
    source
    theorem SetTheory.PGame.impartialAux_def {G : SetTheory.PGame} :
    G.ImpartialAux ↔ G ≈ -G ∧ (∀ (i : G.LeftMoves), (G.moveLeft i).ImpartialAux) ∧ ∀ (j : G.RightMoves), (G.moveRight j).ImpartialAux
    source
    class SetTheory.PGame.Impartial (G : SetTheory.PGame) :
    Prop

    A typeclass on impartial games.

    • out : G.ImpartialAux
    Instances
      source
      theorem SetTheory.PGame.impartial_iff_aux {G : SetTheory.PGame} :
      G.Impartial ↔ G.ImpartialAux
      source
      theorem SetTheory.PGame.impartial_def {G : SetTheory.PGame} :
      G.Impartial ↔ G ≈ -G ∧ (∀ (i : G.LeftMoves), (G.moveLeft i).Impartial) ∧ ∀ (j : G.RightMoves), (G.moveRight j).Impartial
      source
      instance SetTheory.PGame.Impartial.impartial_zero :
      SetTheory.PGame.Impartial 0
      source
      instance SetTheory.PGame.Impartial.impartial_star :
      SetTheory.PGame.star.Impartial
      source
      theorem SetTheory.PGame.Impartial.neg_equiv_self (G : SetTheory.PGame) [h : G.Impartial] :
      G ≈ -G
      source
      @[simp]
      theorem SetTheory.PGame.Impartial.mk'_neg_equiv_self (G : SetTheory.PGame) [G.Impartial] :
      -⟦G⟧ = ⟦G⟧
      source
      instance SetTheory.PGame.Impartial.moveLeft_impartial {G : SetTheory.PGame} [h : G.Impartial] (i : G.LeftMoves) :
      (G.moveLeft i).Impartial
      source
      instance SetTheory.PGame.Impartial.moveRight_impartial {G : SetTheory.PGame} [h : G.Impartial] (j : G.RightMoves) :
      (G.moveRight j).Impartial
      source
      @[irreducible]
      theorem SetTheory.PGame.Impartial.impartial_congr {G H : SetTheory.PGame} (e : G.Relabelling H) [G.Impartial] :
      H.Impartial
      source
      @[irreducible]
      instance SetTheory.PGame.Impartial.impartial_add (G H : SetTheory.PGame) [G.Impartial] [H.Impartial] :
      (G + H).Impartial
      source
      @[irreducible]
      instance SetTheory.PGame.Impartial.impartial_neg (G : SetTheory.PGame) [G.Impartial] :
      (-G).Impartial
      source
      theorem SetTheory.PGame.Impartial.nonpos (G : SetTheory.PGame) [G.Impartial] :
      ¬0 < G
      source
      theorem SetTheory.PGame.Impartial.nonneg (G : SetTheory.PGame) [G.Impartial] :
      ¬G < 0
      source
      theorem SetTheory.PGame.Impartial.equiv_or_fuzzy_zero (G : SetTheory.PGame) [G.Impartial] :
      G ≈ 0 ∨ G.Fuzzy 0

      In an impartial game, either the first player always wins, or the second player always wins.

      source
      @[simp]
      theorem SetTheory.PGame.Impartial.not_equiv_zero_iff (G : SetTheory.PGame) [G.Impartial] :
      ¬G ≈ 0 ↔ G.Fuzzy 0
      source
      @[simp]
      theorem SetTheory.PGame.Impartial.not_fuzzy_zero_iff (G : SetTheory.PGame) [G.Impartial] :
      ¬G.Fuzzy 0 ↔ G ≈ 0
      source
      theorem SetTheory.PGame.Impartial.add_self (G : SetTheory.PGame) [G.Impartial] :
      G + G ≈ 0
      source
      @[simp]
      theorem SetTheory.PGame.Impartial.mk'_add_self (G : SetTheory.PGame) [G.Impartial] :
      ⟦G⟧ + ⟦G⟧ = 0
      source
      theorem SetTheory.PGame.Impartial.equiv_iff_add_equiv_zero (G : SetTheory.PGame) [G.Impartial] (H : SetTheory.PGame) :
      H ≈ G ↔ H + G ≈ 0

      This lemma doesn't require H to be impartial.

      source
      theorem SetTheory.PGame.Impartial.equiv_iff_add_equiv_zero' (G : SetTheory.PGame) [G.Impartial] (H : SetTheory.PGame) :
      G ≈ H ↔ G + H ≈ 0

      This lemma doesn't require H to be impartial.

      source
      theorem SetTheory.PGame.Impartial.le_zero_iff {G : SetTheory.PGame} [G.Impartial] :
      G ≤ 0 ↔ 0 ≤ G
      source
      theorem SetTheory.PGame.Impartial.lf_zero_iff {G : SetTheory.PGame} [G.Impartial] :
      G.LF 0 ↔ SetTheory.PGame.LF 0 G
      source
      theorem SetTheory.PGame.Impartial.equiv_zero_iff_le (G : SetTheory.PGame) [G.Impartial] :
      G ≈ 0 ↔ G ≤ 0
      source
      theorem SetTheory.PGame.Impartial.fuzzy_zero_iff_lf (G : SetTheory.PGame) [G.Impartial] :
      G.Fuzzy 0 ↔ G.LF 0
      source
      theorem SetTheory.PGame.Impartial.equiv_zero_iff_ge (G : SetTheory.PGame) [G.Impartial] :
      G ≈ 0 ↔ 0 ≤ G
      source
      theorem SetTheory.PGame.Impartial.fuzzy_zero_iff_gf (G : SetTheory.PGame) [G.Impartial] :
      G.Fuzzy 0 ↔ SetTheory.PGame.LF 0 G
      source
      theorem SetTheory.PGame.Impartial.forall_leftMoves_fuzzy_iff_equiv_zero (G : SetTheory.PGame) [G.Impartial] :
      (∀ (i : G.LeftMoves), (G.moveLeft i).Fuzzy 0) ↔ G ≈ 0
      source
      theorem SetTheory.PGame.Impartial.forall_rightMoves_fuzzy_iff_equiv_zero (G : SetTheory.PGame) [G.Impartial] :
      (∀ (j : G.RightMoves), (G.moveRight j).Fuzzy 0) ↔ G ≈ 0
      source
      theorem SetTheory.PGame.Impartial.exists_left_move_equiv_iff_fuzzy_zero (G : SetTheory.PGame) [G.Impartial] :
      (∃ (i : G.LeftMoves), G.moveLeft i ≈ 0) ↔ G.Fuzzy 0
      source
      theorem SetTheory.PGame.Impartial.exists_right_move_equiv_iff_fuzzy_zero (G : SetTheory.PGame) [G.Impartial] :
      (∃ (j : G.RightMoves), G.moveRight j ≈ 0) ↔ G.Fuzzy 0