Homs of smooth vector bundles over the same base space #
Here we show that Bundle.ContinuousLinearMap
is a smooth vector bundle.
Note that we only do this for bundles of linear maps, not for bundles of arbitrary semilinear maps.
To do it for semilinear maps, we would need to generalize ContinuousLinearMap.contMDiff
(and ContinuousLinearMap.contDiff
) to semilinear maps.
Equations
- โฏ = โฏ
Equations
- โฏ = โฏ
Consider a smooth map v : M โ Eโ
to a vector bundle, over a basemap bโ : M โ Bโ
, and
another basemap bโ : M โ Bโ
. Given linear maps ฯ m : Eโ (bโ m) โ Eโ (bโ m)
depending smoothly
on m
, one can apply ฯ m
to g m
, and the resulting map is smooth.
Note that the smoothness of ฯ
can not be always be stated as smoothness of a map into a manifold,
as the pullback bundles bโ *แต Eโ
and bโ *แต Eโ
only make sense when bโ
and bโ
are globally
smooth, but we want to apply this lemma with only local information. Therefore, we formulate it
using smoothness of ฯ
read in coordinates.
Version for ContMDiffWithinAt
. We also give a version for ContMDiffAt
, but no version for
ContMDiffOn
or ContMDiff
as our assumption, written in coordinates, only makes sense around
a point.
Consider a smooth map v : M โ Eโ
to a vector bundle, over a basemap bโ : M โ Bโ
, and
another basemap bโ : M โ Bโ
. Given linear maps ฯ m : Eโ (bโ m) โ Eโ (bโ m)
depending smoothly
on m
, one can apply ฯ m
to g m
, and the resulting map is smooth.
Note that the smoothness of ฯ
can not be always be stated as smoothness of a map into a manifold,
as the pullback bundles bโ *แต Eโ
and bโ *แต Eโ
only make sense when bโ
and bโ
are globally
smooth, but we want to apply this lemma with only local information. Therefore, we formulate it
using smoothness of ฯ
read in coordinates.
Version for ContMDiffAt
. We also give a version for ContMDiffWithinAt
, but no version for
ContMDiffOn
or ContMDiff
as our assumption, written in coordinates, only makes sense around
a point.