The homology sequence #
If 0 ⟶ X₁ ⟶ X₂ ⟶ X₃ ⟶ 0
is a short exact sequence in a category of complexes
HomologicalComplex C c
in an abelian category (i.e. S
is a short complex in
that category and satisfies hS : S.ShortExact
), then whenever i
and j
are degrees
such that hij : c.Rel i j
, then there is a long exact sequence :
... ⟶ S.X₁.homology i ⟶ S.X₂.homology i ⟶ S.X₃.homology i ⟶ S.X₁.homology j ⟶ ...
.
The connecting homomorphism S.X₃.homology i ⟶ S.X₁.homology j
is hS.δ i j hij
, and
the exactness is asserted as lemmas hS.homology_exact₁
, hS.homology_exact₂
and
hS.homology_exact₃
.
The proof is based on the snake lemma, similarly as it was originally done in the Liquid Tensor Experiment.
References #
The morphism K.opcycles i ⟶ K.cycles j
that is induced by K.d i j
.
Equations
- K.opcyclesToCycles i j = K.liftCycles (K.fromOpcycles i j) (c.next j) ⋯ ⋯
Instances For
The natural transformation K.opcyclesToCycles i j : K.opcycles i ⟶ K.cycles j
for all
K : HomologicalComplex C c
.
Equations
- HomologicalComplex.natTransOpCyclesToCycles C c i j = { app := fun (K : HomologicalComplex C c) => K.opcyclesToCycles i j, naturality := ⋯ }
Instances For
The diagram K.homology i ⟶ K.opcycles i ⟶ K.cycles j ⟶ K.homology j
.
Equations
- HomologicalComplex.HomologySequence.composableArrows₃ K i j = CategoryTheory.ComposableArrows.mk₃ (K.homologyι i) (K.opcyclesToCycles i j) (K.homologyπ j)
Instances For
The diagram K.homology i ⟶ K.opcycles i ⟶ K.cycles j ⟶ K.homology j
is exact
when c.Rel i j
.
The functor HomologicalComplex C c ⥤ ComposableArrows C 3
that maps K
to the
diagram K.homology i ⟶ K.opcycles i ⟶ K.cycles j ⟶ K.homology j
.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
If X₁ ⟶ X₂ ⟶ X₃ ⟶ 0
is an exact sequence of homological complexes, then
X₁.opcycles i ⟶ X₂.opcycles i ⟶ X₃.opcycles i ⟶ 0
is exact. This lemma states
the exactness at X₂.opcycles i
, while the fact that X₂.opcycles i ⟶ X₃.opcycles i
is an epi is an instance.
If 0 ⟶ X₁ ⟶ X₂ ⟶ X₃
is an exact sequence of homological complex, then
0 ⟶ X₁.cycles i ⟶ X₂.cycles i ⟶ X₃.cycles i
is exact. This lemma states
the exactness at X₂.cycles i
, while the fact that X₁.cycles i ⟶ X₂.cycles i
is a mono is an instance.
Given a short exact short complex S : HomologicalComplex C c
, and degrees i
and j
such that c.Rel i j
, this is the snake diagram whose four lines are respectively
obtained by applying the functors homologyFunctor C c i
, opcyclesFunctor C c i
,
cyclesFunctor C c j
, homologyFunctor C c j
to S
. Applying the snake lemma to this
gives the homology sequence of S
.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
The connecting homoomorphism S.X₃.homology i ⟶ S.X₁.homology j
for a short exact
short complex S
.
Equations
- hS.δ i j hij = (HomologicalComplex.HomologySequence.snakeInput hS i j hij).δ
Instances For
Exactness of S.X₃.homology i ⟶ S.X₁.homology j ⟶ S.X₂.homology j
.
Exactness of S.X₁.homology i ⟶ S.X₂.homology i ⟶ S.X₃.homology i
.
Exactness of S.X₂.homology i ⟶ S.X₃.homology i ⟶ S.X₁.homology j
.