The Jacobi-Zariski exact sequence #
Given R → S → T, the Jacobi-Zariski exact sequence is
H¹(L_{T/R}) → H¹(L_{T/S}) → T ⊗[S] Ω[S/R] → Ω[T/R] → Ω[T/S] → 0
The maps are
Given representations 0 → I → R[X] → S → 0 and 0 → K → S[Y] → T → 0,
we may consider the induced representation 0 → J → R[X, Y] → T → 0, and the sequence
T ⊗[S] (I/I²) → J/J² → K/K² is exact.
Given R[X] → S and S[Y] → T, the cotangent space of R[X][Y] → T is isomorphic
to the direct product of the cotangent space of S[Y] → T and R[X] → S (base changed to T).
Equations
Instances For
Given representations R[X] → S and S[Y] → T, the sequence
T ⊗[S] (⨁ₓ S dx) → (⨁ₓ T dx) ⊕ (⨁ᵧ T dy) → ⨁ᵧ T dy
is exact.
Given 0 → I → S[Y] → T → 0, this is an auxiliary map from S[Y] to T ⊗[S] Ω[S⁄R] whose
restriction to ker(I/I² → ⊕ S dyᵢ) is the connecting homomorphism in the Jacobi-Zariski sequence.
Equations
- Algebra.Generators.H1Cotangent.δAux R Q = (Finsupp.lsum R) fun (f : ι →₀ ℕ) => ↑R ((TensorProduct.mk S T Ω[S⁄R]) (f.prod fun (x1 : ι) (x2 : ℕ) => Q.val x1 ^ x2)) ∘ₗ ↑(KaehlerDifferential.D R S)
Instances For
The connecting homomorphism in the Jacobi-Zariski sequence for given presentations.
Given representations 0 → I → R[X] → S → 0 and 0 → K → S[Y] → T → 0,
we may consider the induced representation 0 → J → R[X, Y] → T → 0,
and this map is obtained by applying snake lemma to the following diagram
T ⊗[S] Ω[S/R] → Ω[T/R] → Ω[T/S] → 0
↑ ↑ ↑
0 → T ⊗[S] (⨁ₓ S dx) → (⨁ₓ T dx) ⊕ (⨁ᵧ T dy) → ⨁ᵧ T dy → 0
↑ ↑ ↑
T ⊗[S] (I/I²) → J/J² → K/K² → 0
↑ ↑
H¹(L_{T/R}) → H¹(L_{T/S})
This is independent from the presentations chosen. See H1Cotangent.δ_comp_equiv.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
A variant of exact_map_δ that takes in an arbitrary map between generators.
Given algebras R → S → T, H¹(L_{T/R}) → H¹(L_{T/S}) → T ⊗[S] Ω[S/R] is exact.
Given algebras R → S → T, H¹(L_{T/S}) → T ⊗[S] Ω[S/R] → Ω[T/R] is exact.