Push negations in the goal of some assumption.

For instance, a hypothesis h : ¬ ∀ x, ∃ y, x ≤ y will be transformed by push_neg at h into h : ∃ x, ∀ y, y < x. Variables names are conserved.

This tactic pushes negations inside expressions. For instance, given an assumption

h : ¬ ∀ ε > 0, ∃ δ > 0, ∀ x, |x - x₀| ≤ δ → |f x - y₀| ≤ ε)

writing push_neg at h will turn h into

h : ∃ ε, ε > 0 ∧ ∀ δ, δ > 0 → (∃ x, |x - x₀| ≤ δ ∧ ε < |f x - y₀|),

(the pretty printer does not use the abreviations ∀ δ > 0 and ∃ ε > 0 but this issue has nothing to do with push_neg). Note that names are conserved by this tactic, contrary to what would happen with simp using the relevant lemmas. One can also use this tactic at the goal using push_neg, at every assumption and the goal using push_neg at * or at selected assumptions and the goal using say push_neg at h h' ⊢ as usual.

Matches either an identifier "h" or a pair of identifiers "h with k"

Transforms the goal into its contrapositive.

• contrapose turns a goal P → Q into ¬ Q → ¬ P
• contrapose! turns a goal P → Q into ¬ Q → ¬ P and pushes negations inside P and Q using push_neg
• contrapose h first reverts the local assumption h, and then uses contrapose and intro h
• contrapose! h first reverts the local assumption h, and then uses contrapose! and intro h
• contrapose h with new_h uses the name new_h for the introduced hypothesis

The syntax is #push_neg e, where e is an expression, which will print the push_neg form of e.

#push_neg understands local variables, so you can use them to introduce parameters.